Channel
@tirtanz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001300839914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tirtanz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tirtanz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 54 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 55 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 55 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 18 | 37.5% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 29.2% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برای دشمن ش.ه.ید شهبازی از محمدرضا شهبازی خطرناکتر است! نه فقط برای دشمن! جسارتا شما هم مجبور میشوید پنجههای گاه و بیگاهی را که توی صورت شهبازی میکشید تا برادریتان را به جریان روشنفکر ثابت کنید، تعطیل کنید!! مجبورید دنبالهرو راهش باشید. آن روز دیگر نمیتوانید هزاران جوانی را که میخواهند مثل شهبازی باشند پشت در اتاقهایتان معطل کنید یا با اولین سوتیِ «یخچال طور» نمیتوانید حذفشان کنید! آنوقت به سبک خودتان …
❤🔥2🤬1
به مناسبت روز پزشک یادی کنیم از بزرگترین اشتباه پزشکی تاریخ... امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
❤2🤣2
آقای رئیسی! این اوسکولا یه چیزی گفتن تو چرا گوش کردی و دعا کردی و ما رو انداختی گیر روحانی و پزشکیان؟😭 امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
😨3💔2
ما باید پارادایم رو تغییر بدیم یعنی از این به بعد به جای اینکه به حرفای فرانچسکو گوش بدیم به حرفای چسانفرکو گوش میدیم😎 امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
🤣3👌1
گفتید که وضعیت ما بد شده است؟! وضع خودتان شبیه گنبد شده است! آن آب که فکر میکنی بسیار است، آبیست که دیگر از سرت رد شده است! امین شفیعی
🤣2😁1
خوب خوب زیارت همه قبول برگردیم با طنز پردازی ما که جا مونده بودیم شما ما رو یاد کردید؟ امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
🤣1
مهاجرانی گفته ظریف سرباز نظامه. اینجا سرباز نظام داره دنبال رد فرانچسکو میگرده! امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
🤣4
سعید جلیلی کسایی که بعد حمله امریکا دنبال مذاکره افتادن رو به گوسالهپرستان زمان موسی(ع) تشبیه کرده. بعد غربپرستا رم کردن🤦♂ امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
🤣2👎1😁1
از طرح رفراندوم میرحسین ۷۰۰ نفر حمایت کردن و از طرح همکاری ملی پهلوی ۵۰ هزار نفر! یه دو دقیقه ارکان جمهوری اسلامی رو نلرزونید ببینیم چی میشه! امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
😁3
امروز تو برقمن نوشته بود برقمون ساعت ۱۷ میره ولی فرانچسکو به مامور شبکه گفت برقشون رو ۹ شب قطع کن🤦 امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
😁3
رمز گشایی از عضو مذاکره کننده با فرانچسکو😱 امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
😁2
یعنی به جای این همه که با آمریکا مذاکره کردیم، با تروئیکای اروپایی مذاکره کردیم، با آژانس مذاکره کردیم، با واسطهگری عمان مذاکره کردیم، باید با فرانچسکو مذاکره میکردیم؟ امین شفیعی😁 @tirtanz
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tirtanz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,431,101 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تیرطنز|تیکه گاه امین شفیعی” (@tirtanz), 54 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tirtanz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.