2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 10:04
232
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:32
232
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
46.8%
avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,171
Reactions total
107
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
27
Videos
5
Links
22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
38
35.5%
❤
29
27.1%
custom 5240476433221953356
8
7.48%
👍
7
6.54%
⚡
6
5.61%
🤣
5
4.67%
😢
4
3.74%
💔
3
2.80%
😱
2
1.87%
🥴
2
1.87%
custom 4997289389148079171
1
0.935%
👏
1
0.935%
🤔
1
0.935%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎮 Техдолг против фич
Ты в команде год. Есть сервис, который считает клиентам деньги: тарифы, скидки, пересчёт при смене плана. Ему четыре года, писали до тебя, двое авторов давно уволились. Тестами покрыто процентов пятнадцать, конфиги лежат в трёх местах, а логика скидок живёт в функции на восемьсот строк, куда каждый пришедший добавлял свой if.
Разбираешься в нём лучше всех ты, потому что весь этот год чинил его …
Про задротские хобби: 303 часа ДнД в базу знаний
Кто знает меня лично, тот в курсе: я очень люблю ДнД. Раньше мы с друзьями много играли, собирались компанией за столом. А проект «Грядут приключения» смотрю чуть ли не с самого его создания.
И тут вышла смешная история. Мастер проекта Гоша Воронин кинул клич, что нужна помощь с пересказом сериала. Я написал в комментах, что могу помочь - работаю с ИИ и большими данн…
Всё, бета кончилась. Сеньорчик, тренажёр к айтишным собесам, работает и открыт всем 🥳
Три недели назад я звал сюда в закрытый тест, а потом сел допиливать по фидбекам (отдельный прикол, что пришлось по личкам бегать, потому что первоначальный набор тестеров оказался слишком пассивный😏). Ролей стало одиннадцать вместо пяти: к дата-профессиям (DS/ML, аналитик данных, дата-инженер) добавились Java, Python, Go, Rust, De…
🎮 Токсичный гений - ответ
Начну с того, что тут вообще не должно быть твоей задачей. Токсичный сеньор, из-за которого разбегается команда, это управленческая проблема. Чинить её обязан тимлид, а если тимлид не тянет, то его руководитель. У мидла нет ни полномочий, ни доплаты за это, ни рычага. Ты один раз про проблему сказал. Тебе ответили «потерпите». Всё, работа сделана, дальше мяч не на твоей стороне.
А раз так,…
🎮 Токсичный гений
Ты мидл. В конторе год, задачи закрываешь ровно, вопросов к тебе нет. Ни команды под тобой, ни права что-то решать.
В команде есть человек - сильнейший инженер из всех, кого ты видел живьём. Писал ядро сервиса, помнит наизусть, почему пять лет назад там сделали именно так, разбирает ночной инцидент за сорок минут там, где остальные копают сутки. На нём держится половина системы.
И он же выжигает …
Год назад я зашёл на hh глянуть джуновские вакансии и просто ужаснулся: по 1000+ откликов на нормальную позицию, требования конские, зарплаты смешные. Зашёл недавно ещё раз. Стало только хуже 📉
Расклад такой. Вакансий для джунов стало меньше, планка требований уехала в потолок (от джуна ждут готового спеца, которого можно сразу в бой), а сверху на всё это упал ИИ. И вот это главное изменение за год.
Смотрите, какой…
Apple выложила первый трейлер сериала "Нейромант" (Neuromancer) по мотивам одноимённого фантастического романа отца киберпанка Уильяма Гибсона.
Всё на месте - и кибердека и матрица, и Кейс и Молли с лезвиями в ногтях и Армитидж и Тессье Эшпулы и даже небо цвета экрана телевизора, настроенного на пустой канал. Наверное и Зимнее Безмолвие где-то рядом.
Премьера - 22 января 2027 года на Apple TV+.
@zavtracast
Личные ИИ-ассистенты
347 тысяч звёзд на гитхабе, обошёл даже React - сейчас это самый популярный проект на планете. Зовут OpenClaw, и это личный ИИ-ассистент, который живёт у тебя прямо в телеге. Пишешь ему как коллеге, он помнит твой контекст и сам пашет в фоне: разгребает почту, ведёт напоминалки, собирает план на неделю, заказывает продукты.
Как это устроено. Сама модель - Claude, GPT, Qwen - это мозг. А ассисте…
🎮 Суфлёр на собесе - ответ
Разберём по вариантам.
Вариант А - врубить на полную. Аргумент «на работе всё равно кодить с ИИ» я и сам недавно топил в посте про лайфкодинг: театральность этих секций - факт. Только посчитай, что именно ты покупаешь вместе с оффером. Испытательный срок - тот же собес, растянутый на три месяца, и суфлёра там уже нет: дыру между «показал на секции» и «умею на самом деле» закрывать будешь …
🔥4custom 52404764332219533562👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tiredcode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А. Врубаю на полную. На работе всё равно кодить с ИИ, чем собес лучше39%
Б. Держу как страховку: молчит в фоне, врубаю только если совсем тону24%
В. Спрашиваю интервьюера прямо: можно решать с ИИ? Пусть сами решают11%
Г. Иду честно и без всего. Провалю так провалю, зато сплю спокойно16%
Д. Пас. Ищу конторы, где вместо литкода нормальный формат собеса11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уставший кодер | IT, DS/ML” (@tiredcode), 232 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiredcode.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.