Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Аналитика Тинькофф инвестиций(не официальное сообщество)

@tinkoff_analytics_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

378subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002210258963
TypeChannel
Username@tinkoff_analytics_official
Created5 June 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tinkoff_analytics_official

Growth

3787 Aug 2026, 12:48 — 378 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 378 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:488 Aug 2026, 06:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 377–379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:16378no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:48378first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 5 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

330 reactions across 2 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4814.5%
👍4714.2%
4012.1%
👏4012.1%
🔥4012.1%
🎉3811.5%
🥰3711.2%
😍3310.0%
👾41.21%
👎20.606%
❤‍🔥10.303%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 330reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2024 to 23 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2024, 19:12 UTC≈2,390 views159 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fragment.com/username/itstinkoff https://fragment.com/username/tinkoff_analytics_official https://fragment.com/username/tinkoff_central_university https://fragment.com/username/tinkoff_crew https://fragment.com/username/tinkoff_gorod https://fragment.com/username/tinkoff_uchebnik https://fragment.com/username/tinkoffbank_team https://fragment.com/username/tinkoffjobs

👍27🔥23😁23👏2019😍18🎉15🥰14

5 Jun 2024, 14:46 UTC≈3,090 views171 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сначала было слово, теперь — буква. Тинькофф теперь Т-Банк. Да, это официально ⚡️ Почему Т-Банк: упрощение имени — логичный шаг и для сотрудников, и для клиентов. Мы давно ввели «Т» в обиход внутри компании, многие сервисы для команды уже давно называем в этой логике: Т-кухня, ТWork, T-Game и так далее. Также это органичный способ объединить все наши продукты и сервисы одной буквой, без лишних слов. Как будет прох

😁25🎉23🥰2321👍20👏20🔥17😍15

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @tinkoff_analytics_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,172,907 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аналитика Тинькофф инвестиций(не официальное сообщество)” (@tinkoff_analytics_official), 378 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tinkoff_analytics_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.