Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

叨庭涂说

@tingtalk_all

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

828subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001492383906
TypeChannel
Username@tingtalk_all
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tingtalk_all

Growth

8286 Aug 2026, 15:47 — 828 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:10 — 828 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:476 Aug 2026, 17:10
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 827–829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 17:10828no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:47828first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 5 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2024 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 17:41 UTC373 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#新生儿 黄金 #哄睡 组合技:5S 安抚法 这段视频由知名儿科医生 Harvey Karp 亲自示范,包含包裹、侧抱、嘘声、摇晃、吮吸。 来自:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OtPSfyZXNw

👍3

20 Sept 2025, 15:37 UTC≈1,590 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

房东装的水龙头 #角阀,十之八九是锌合金货色。螺纹一受力,便如老骨头般脆断。上网一查,原来这并非孤例,商业社会的逻辑,永远是一分钱一分货。幸而碰上热心邻居,借得一只 #取丝器,方才化险为夷。

👍4

20 May 2024, 06:21 UTC≈2,850 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

在线 #PDF 转 #PPT(#PowerPoint) https://www.ilovepdf.com/pdf_to_powerpoint #压缩 PDF 的效果也好: https://www.ilovepdf.com/compress_pdf

👍1

31 Mar 2024, 16:34 UTC≈2,810 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

排版优美的 #诗词 网站,带拼音,含释义。 https://aspoem.com

👍1

17 Mar 2024, 05:19 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 6 August 2026

中英文混排工具by #评论尸 @pls1q43 https://1q43.blog/add-blank 1. 自动在 #中文 和 #英文 之间加空格 2. 自动在 #中文 和 #数字 之间加空格 3. 自动把“蝌蚪”引号换成「直角引号」 🌰 例如: 会自动将:3月22日,Apple公司宣布:“我们不干啦!” 变更为:3 月 22 日,Apple 公司宣布:「我们不干啦!」 #排版 #空格 #直角引号

17 Mar 2024, 03:27 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 6 August 2026

差不多两年没 #洗牙 了,于是在美团 App 上找了一家附近老牌私立口腔医院 EM,已经在本地开了二十多年。洗牙团购券不贵,只要 40 元。 约了周六上午十点钟 🕙,等了十几分钟,洗牙十几分钟。医生说我的牙齿很健康,没有蛀牙,连智齿都很干净。只有两个小问题: 1. 饭后除了使用牙线,还要漱口,因为里面的磨牙有点发黄; 2. 在 2017 年之前,我还没有开始使用电动牙刷 🪥。而手动刷牙时,我用力横刷,导致牙龈处的牙釉质被刷出了小沟槽,所以吃太冷的食物时会感到微酸。可以补一补,只要几百元。也可以不处理。

12 Mar 2024, 12:14 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

自动计算 #站立 #办公桌 的最佳高度 by Ergotron OR Bauhütte 自动计算 #坐姿 办公桌 的最佳高度 by Bauhütte

11 Feb 2024, 05:09 UTC≈1,630 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

“龙”不应该翻译成 dragon。 Dragon 的本意是凶残的有翼巨兽、恶魔、悍妇等。中国人在外国人面前自称 dragon,是自我妖魔化。 “龙”也不应该翻译成 long。Long 的英文发音不是“龙”,而是“狼”,这不是真正的音译。 “龙”应该翻译成 loong 🐲,它的发音和“龙”相近,在英文中本来就是“龙”字的音译,如著名武术家李小龙的英文名字是“Lee Siu Loong”。有些西方人也把龙称为 loong。 Loong 的两个“o”字母象龙的两只眼睛,loong 使人联想到 long(长长的龙🐉),所以它也是一个象形文字,和汉字特色相通。 来源 loong.cn

👍5

7 Feb 2024, 11:41 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐯虎皮肉卷🫔 1. 五花肉馅,不能太细,只能手剁或者肉丝机制作,这样才能保留猪肉原汁; 2. 按照饮食喜好,加入佐料香菇和虾米提鲜; 3. 加入蕉芋面粉,增加肉丁粘性; 4. 把肉馅放在腐竹皮里卷起来; 5. 只要在油锅里炸十分钟左右,焦香,肉香,油脂香,便香飘满屋。偷吃五根 #肉卷,都觉得不过分。

5 Feb 2024, 14:12 UTC≈1,230 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#煎堆,“堆”正写作䭔(duī),饼也。 我们这边的主要食材包括糯米粉、纯净水、白砂糖、花生碎和芝麻等,将其揉成团状,最后油炸至金黄酥脆。 别名有: - 海南:珍袋(这个音译太妙了!) - 闽东:马蛋或烰(fú)油 - 武汉:欢喜坨 - 台湾:芝麻球 - 东北:麻圆 - 华北:麻团 - 江浙:麻球 - 广西:油堆 祝大家:🍡 煎堆辘辘,金银满屋 💰

👍2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @tingtalk_all. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 258,722 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“叨庭涂说” (@tingtalk_all), 828 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tingtalk_all.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.