Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тимур и его блог | парсинг автоматизация

Channel

Тимур и его блог | парсинг автоматизация

@timur_parsing_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

344subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157552533
TypeChannel
Username@timur_parsing_blog
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/timur_parsing_blog

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3443503477 August 2026 — 350 subscribers8 August 2026 — 350 subscribers16 August 2026 — 349 subscribers23 August 2026 — 347 subscribers30 August 2026 — 348 subscribers8 September 2026 — 344 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 343–351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 20:22344-4
30 Aug 2026, 20:18348+1
23 Aug 2026, 13:14347-2
16 Aug 2026, 05:18349-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:48350no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:24350first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5044.2%
🔥3934.5%
87.08%
😱87.08%
🤔43.54%
👎10.885%
👏10.885%
😁10.885%
🤯10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timur_parsing_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 October 2025 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC79 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за июль Всем привет, переходим потихоньку к росту, использования растут, новые заказы от вас поступают, дальше больше 🚀 Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за июль: 399 раз или 13 раз/день По популярности парсеры: 1. Продавцы 206 2. Запросы 106 3. Харак-ки 44 4. Бренды 25 +1⤴️ 5. Категории 16 -1⤵️ 6. Отзывы

👍3

24 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC202 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за июнь Всем привет, как и ожидалось сильнейшее падение по использованию сервиса, но ничего страшного, лето и этом все связано👍 Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за июнь: 294 раз или 10 раз/день По популярности парсеры: 1. Продавцы 108 +1 ⤴️ 2. Запросы 105 -1⤵️ 3. Харак-ки 60 4. Категории 10 5. Бренды 8 6. Отзывы

👍4

2 Jun 2026, 06:57 UTC485 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за май Всем привет, вот и наступило лето, сезон отпусков и просто отдыха, а мы подводим итоги мая Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за май: 650 раз или 21 раз/день По популярности парсеры: 1. Запросы 369 2. Продавцы 155 3. Харак-ки 89 4. Категории 19 5. Бренды 15 6. Отзывы 3 Спасибо, что пользуетесь, любая ваша п

👍3

6 May 2026, 06:14 UTC461 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за апрель Всем привет, подводим итоги апреля Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за февраль: 852 раз или 28 раз/день По популярности парсеры: 1. Запросы 318 2. Продавцы 233 3. Харак-ки 206 4. Категории 56 5. Бренды 23 +1 ⤴️ 6. Отзывы 16 -1 ⤵️ Идет небольшое восстановление активности в боте, не смотря на введе

👍21

20 Apr 2026, 10:26 UTC448 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сбор обратной связи. В целях совершенствования сервиса просим направлять предложения по добавлению, изменению или модификации функционала бота в комментариях к этому посту или в чате #обратная_связь@timur_parsing_blog.

🔥3

7 Apr 2026, 12:03 UTC537 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за март Всем привет, подводим итоги марта Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за февраль: 800 раз или 26 раз/день По популярности парсеры: 1. Запросы 289 2. Продавцы 223 3. Харак-ки 139 4. Категории 85 5. Отзывы 35 +1 ⤴️ 6. Бренды 29 -1 ⤵️ Наблюдаю снижение активности использования, связываю это с замедлением

🔥2

26 Mar 2026, 11:42 UTC476 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Анонс ⚠️ Многие просили и просят реализовать мониторинг цен на wb по товару, запускаю бота в тг в тесте требуются добровольцы в тестировании, писать в лс. Вопросы и предложения в чате По возможности поддержите донатом: Тбанк: https://www.tbank.ru/cf/AjK4syUPVHn Юmoney: https://yoomoney.ru/to/4100119013784418 Или в лс по номеру телефона #анонс@timur_parsing_blog

🔥4

24 Mar 2026, 11:17 UTC395 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Объявление 📣 Запустил в тесте бота в ВК https://vk.com/wildberries_scraping_bot , уже можно потыкать. Обратная связь и предложения приветствуются. Группа ВК: https://vk.ru/parsers_wildberries Бот парсер вб в ВК: https://vk.com/wildberries_scraping_bot Вопросы и предложения в чате По возможности поддержите донатом: Тбанк: https://www.tbank.ru/cf/AjK4syUPVHn Юmoney: https://yoomoney.ru/to/4100119013784418 Или в л

👍5🔥3👏1

23 Mar 2026, 13:23 UTC373 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Анонс ⚠️ В связи с замедлением телеграм разрабатываю аналогичный функционал в ВКонтакте, чтобы у всех желающих был полноценный доступ. На старте пока будет только: - парсер поиска, - парсер бренда. Группа вк будет: https://vk.ru/parsers_wildberries Вопросы и предложения в чате #анонс@timur_parsing_blog

👍6👎1

16 Mar 2026, 13:42 UTC393 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за февраль Всем привет, подводим итоги февраля Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за февраль: 949 раз или 34 раз/день(28 дней) По популярности парсеры: 1. Запросы 361 2. Продавцы 198 3. Харак-ки 155 4. Категории 116 +1 ⤴️ 5. Бренды 75 +1 ⤴️ 6. Отзывы 44 -2 ⤵️ Скоро вас ждут новые анонсы, готовы к изменениям?

4👍2

20 Feb 2026, 08:48 UTC548 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Статистика за январь Всем привет, заканчивается февраль, а я все еще не выложил статистику за январь, решил исправится😁 Ежемесячное количество использований основных функций бота @wildberries_scraping_bot за январь: 1015 раз или 33 раз/день По популярности парсеры: 1. Запросы 382 +1 ⤴️ 2. Продавцы 222 +1 ⤴️ 3. Харак-ки 196 -2 ⤵️ 4. Отзывы 86 +2 ⤴️ 5. Категории 78 -1 ⤵️

🔥6

27 Jan 2026, 07:31 UTC722 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ Итоги 2025 ⚠️ Пока январь месяц 2026 не закончится, решил подвести итог 2025 года, вот что получилось👍 Всего использований общих функций 12999 раз, что в среднем в месяц 1083 раза или 36 раз в день🔥 Прикрепляю диаграмму по количеству использований вами функций за 2025, вип сервис к сожалению в данную статистику не входит. По всем функциям на основе вашей обратной связи, будут дорабатываться Vip/Pro пользовател

🔥7👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @timur_parsing_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тимур и его блог | парсинг автоматизация” (@timur_parsing_blog), 344 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timur_parsing_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.