Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ред снова-на-грани-псевдоинцеста Робин

@timnerd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002472448789
TypeChannel
Username@timnerd
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 8 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/timnerd

Growth

767776.511 Aug 2026, 04:46 — 77 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:22 — 76 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:4611 Aug 2026, 16:22
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:2276-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:4677first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

572 reactions across 20 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546093534358904737511720.5%
custom 53664756296319198019115.9%
🔥488.39%
427.34%
😭417.17%
custom 5366102061966448643366.29%
🥰356.12%
💔203.50%
💘193.32%
❤‍🔥132.27%
👎132.27%
💯132.27%
🤔132.27%
👀111.92%
81.40%
😢81.40%
😁71.22%
🥴61.05%
🎃40.699%
🎉40.699%
14 further kinds234.02%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 572reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2026, 19:32 UTC40 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👀11🕊4👾1

9 Mar 2026, 11:48 UTC128 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026

мне смешно с жалких

🥰76❤‍🔥3🫡2😭2👾1😎1

1 Sept 2025, 05:02 UTC321 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если вы вдруг меня потеряли: я занят. Преимущественно расследованием, но иногда случаются и неожиданные эксцессы... [это тот же текст, что и в канале у Коннера.] #редочерки

🥰15💘9🎃42❤‍🔥21🔥1

29 Jul 2025, 18:09 UTC396 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Зачем ему вообще сверхчувствительный слух, если о каждом происшествии нужно извещать лично? 😀

🔥16😁72🤨2

20 May 2025, 05:36 UTC500 views43 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @NightwingTheHeroVideo

От админа: Это заняло больше времени, чем я ожидал, так что надеюсь, что вам понравится... Как вам такой формат? Делать ещё? Приглашайте друзей в этот канал 🐦 #НайтМемы

😭23💯8💘6custom 54609353435890473755🥴1

17 May 2025, 15:24 UTC389 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Кажется, трава стала зеленее, небо голубее, мысли яснее... А, теперь ясно. Выключите свет... #редщп

custom 54609353435890473751953🥰2

6 May 2025, 20:31 UTC431 views31 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

На повестке дня снова Найтвинг. Склонность попадать в передряги достойная восхищения. Или это стремление..?

19custom 54609353435890473757🔥3💘2

1 May 2025, 21:15 UTC485 views42 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Найтвинг. На страже вашей сексуальной неприкосновенности. Я пожаловался, что ко мне пристал какой-то великовозрастный мужик. И вот мы здесь. Но я, вообще-то, могу стоять за себя сам. ☝️ #редщп

🔥22custom 546093534358904737511🥰62👏1

9 Apr 2025, 05:41 UTC319 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ну, как, нравятся, просто..?? Моих друзей. Неважно, вы поняли.

custom 536647562963191980115💔5😢3🥴2💩1🤮1

9 Apr 2025, 05:40 UTC312 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Когда я предполагал, что в свете последних событий семья начнет оценивать людей, которые мне нравятся, я подозревал немного не это... (комментарии) #редщп

custom 536647562963191980112💔5🥴3custom 53661020619664486432

1 Apr 2025, 21:02 UTC375 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💵Ахх💸аха💵хапхх💸💸 Бернард ругает меня за... Богатый смех?? И отправляет играть в гольф?? Как контрить? #редщп

custom 536647562963191980115❤‍🔥8custom 54609353435890473754👎1💘1🙊1

1 Apr 2025, 19:51 UTC337 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я заснул во время просмотра. Проснулся от возмущений Дэмиана, а мультик уже кончился. Вообще, мы когда-то смотрели его... С Джеком и Джанет. Очень давно, но я хорошо помню, что возмущался почти как Дэмиан. В этом есть что-то. Родное? Стоит сказать Кэрол спасибо. Как-нибудь косвенно... #редщп

custom 546093534358904737515🥰4custom 53661020619664486434💔3custom 53664756296319198012👎1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @timnerd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,310,435 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ред снова-на-грани-псевдоинцеста Робин” (@timnerd), 76 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timnerd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.