Photo, posted without a caption
🤪4❤3😁3
Signed virusyu🅥

Channel
@timeshack
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
580subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001236220688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @timeshack |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/timeshack |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 580 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 579 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 579 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 29.0% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 22.6% | |
| 🤪 | 4 | 12.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🤪4❤3😁3
Signed virusyu🅥
deepseek这次发布我没追热点 1,其实表现不如预期,无法跟上第一梯队。 2,去年下半年他们发的论文其实很亮眼,从技术上说当时绝对不落伍,按理说版本发布不应该拖这么久。没有任何一家其他大模型拖这么久的。 3,目前基本确定卡在了国产适配上导致了训练延误,这里说的是训练,不是推理,去年deepseek激活了国产芯片的推理市场,这个是真的。不是卡在推理,是卡在训练。 4,最终训练适配这关也没过,一个简单判断,如果是国产芯片训练的,会有大量公开报道。 5,不确定人才流失是否与此有关。本来可以站在一线却因其他因素影响,难说会不会有怨气,当然也可能只是纯粹收入因素。 6,基本可以判断训练国产适配是政治任务,不是商业决策。 7,缺钱,缺算力,已经明牌了,正如我多次讲过的。 8,是不是必须死磕训练芯片国产化,背后底层逻辑是美帝国主义亡我之心不死。而这个逻辑确实是不可证伪的。 9,希望deepseek再攀高峰,回归一线,但目…
❤2
Signed virusyu🅥
一个英伟达的朋友跟我说他在准备跳槽。 我有点惊讶说你都在金字塔顶端了还要跳啊,为什么呢。 他说挣太少了,他好几个朋友这两年都自由或者接近自由的状态了。 我有点怀疑,问你从英伟达出去,别的公司能接的住吗? 他说很多都可以,像字节那些。不过这些就没什么意思了,他关注的是是硅谷那些创业公司的机会。 后面他还举了个例子说他一朋友之前六十多个年薪后面跳到字节seed涨到了两百多个。 马太效应进一步加剧。 跟最近国内裁员满天飞的消息有点割裂,真正意义上的冰火两重天。
❤1
Signed virusyu🅥
为什么币圈的人都纷纷转战AI,是因为喜欢吗
Signed virusyu🅥
以前:人人都是产品经理 现在:人人都是程序员
Signed virusyu🅥
Anthropic 发布了 AI 对劳动力市场的影响报告,里面用了一种新的衡量人工智能对职业替代的新指标:observed exposure(观测到的暴露度)。其中暴露度最高的三个职业是: 1. 程序员 2. 客户服务代表 3. 数据录入员 里面还揭示了一个结论: 在暴露度较高的职业中,22—25 岁的年轻劳动者的就业水平下降了 6—16%。 https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/3f7fd9d552e66269bdb108e207c5d80531d04b8b.pdf
Signed virusyu🅥
「你控制了验证,你就控制了真相。控制了真相,你就拥有了信任。信任,是最终极的护城河。」 这篇文章写挺好。 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/13CMlyh4Rq_-L3igtCEs1w
Signed virusyu🅥
今天程序猿要失业了, 明天设计师要被取代了, 后天演员要退出舞台了, 覆巢之下,复有完卵乎。
Signed virusyu🅥
程序员对自己好点儿,老板的梦想不值得你用生命去换
Signed virusyu🅥
v站上有人发了一个贴问2026新年愿望,热度最高的关键词是保住工作、活着、身体健康。 v站大部分用户是程序员,看起来程序员的日子越来越难了。 https://www.v2ex.com/t/1182875
Signed virusyu🅥
今日最佳评论
❤4😁2
Signed virusyu🅥
Meta用数十亿美元收购了Manus,今年我曾接触过他们公司,hr跟我说地点在北京或者武汉,我没啥兴趣就没面试了。 现在看来我可能错过了一个亿。
Signed virusyu🅥
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @timeshack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,415,901 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“懒人的梦呓” (@timeshack), 580 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timeshack.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.