Channel
@tim961213
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
676subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001353145015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tim961213 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tim961213 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 676 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 677 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 677 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
537 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 246 | 45.8% | |
| ❤ | 159 | 29.6% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 5.59% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 3.17% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 2.79% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 2.79% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 2.79% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 2.42% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 2.23% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.559% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.559% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.372% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.372% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.372% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.186% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.186% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.186% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 537reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2022 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[廢文] 寫在快滿 30 歲之前 原本想說等年底再寫，但最近有點感慨，就先寫了 XD 筆者小時候家住在園區旁邊。 那時候耳邊很常聽到「科技新貴」、「年薪 200 萬」這些詞，每天上學都會看到一群工程師騎著機車，整整齊齊地騎進科學園區，像沙丁魚一樣 XD。 10 歲的我站在路邊看，心裡就覺得 — 如果長大能年薪 200 萬、能騎進那個園區，那我就是世界的神了。 說出來很好笑，不過那時候是真的這樣想的。感覺 200 萬遠到不行，但又覺得只要努力就能到，就這樣。 國中剛好遇到金融海嘯。 大人開始在討論股票，誰賠了多少、誰又賺了多少，筆者才知道原來除了工作，還有別的方式可以賺錢。 然後就開始算，一個國中生在那邊算數學 — 如果我有 3,000 萬，每年賺 10%，不就超過那個夢想年薪了嗎？ 筆者那時候很愛拉著同學朋友、甚至大人討論這些事。結果換來的大多就是笑一笑或是一個「你在想什麼」的眼神，然後走掉。 也對啦，一個國中生在那邊討論資…
❤46👍3
附上目前投資組合(含槓桿)
❤41🔥4
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[投資日記] – 廢文(慢慢來比較快 ? ) 原本打算年底才發這篇文章，但最近無論是市場還是自己的身心狀態都相當動盪，所以決定提前寫下自己對工作的感想和對市場的最新心得。 首先，談談筆者對近期市場的一些看法。最近市場波動率非常高，但經歷過2021和2022年後，大家的心態應該已經穩定不少了吧？如果真的打不贏大盤，不妨考慮加入，通過大盤槓桿的方式也能獲得不錯的收益。 接下來，談談近況如何影響筆者的投資方式。去年畢業後，筆者在10月開始工作，由於工作的關係，大幅減少了研究個股和盯盤的時間。考量到目前的資金規模，筆者選擇了不需要頻繁盯盤和大量研究的個股投資方法（雖然仍使用大量槓桿XD）。現在，筆者把資金分散在債券、股票和房市上。比起以前沒有穩定的現金流和資金較少，現在更注重資產配置。目標是在低波動的情況下獲得最大收益，而不是只關注今年賺取的百分比。開大量的槓桿，通過資產配置降低波動，最終達到甚至超過以往的報酬。 在職場的投資觀…
❤49🥰7👍4🔥1
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[數據分享] - CPI 細項 預期：6.5%；實際：6.5%；上一次 : 7.1% QoQ（%）：-0.1% 食品：0.3% 能源：0.4% 新車：-0.3% 二手車：-2.5% 房租：0.8% 醫療服務（上個月更新醫療保險後的數據）：0.1%
👍19
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[產品體驗分享] - Openai 碼農版突然無法使用驚慌失措的我 筆者早上寫程式寫到一半 Openai 碼農版突然停止運作，結果我就跑去洗衣服 健身，直接成為廢物了。 上網查一下，一堆人哀號，無論 AI 這一次是不是泡沫。對於一些人的生活、工作都已經產生實際的影響了。 https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/43634
🤣8
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[展望未來] - 2023 投資想法分享 - 股債配會復活 - 成長股不會全面復活，但優質成長股會「大幅」優於大盤 - 低估值個股會反彈 -> META、中概、成長、記憶體等等 (有一些已經反彈一段了) - 幣圈今年只會盤 - 會有新的 AI 應用出現，並且會有 AI 公司 IPO ( 可能會是短線好玩的股票 )
👍22
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[早安晨報] 祝大家2023工作/愛情/資產/身體一切順利～
👍31🤣1
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[年度檢討] - 總資產 -56% 好啦，又到了年度的最後一天了。首先先祝大家新年快樂，雖然今年真的很難，但還是希望大家都快樂，或許有點難，但黎明前總是黑暗的對吧 ? #過程 對我來說今年過程是這樣的，可以分成三大部分。 1. 烏俄戰爭前 2. 烏俄戰爭後年中左右 3. 年中到年尾 也對應者我人生三大改變，因此感觸實在是很多，不過這篇還是專注在投資檢討吧~ #烏俄戰爭前 -> 自信地反抗期 這時候的筆者，認為 QQQ 已經從高點回落 20%往下的空間已經不大了，並且這時候其實也有好好守城。所以其實總體帳戶來看就是 -15% 左右而已。對我自己來說完全就正常的回檔，並沒有覺得任何需要擔心。也認為自己現在進去抄底成本會很漂亮，又是一波發財的機會，非常的自信。 #烏俄戰爭後年中左右 -> 自信地摧毀期 從自信的進去的抄底到每天睡不著覺，幾乎天天都四、五點左右才睡著。如同上述此階段一開始的我，其實挺自信的，並且維持者自己的大進大…
👍59🙏15❤8😱6🔥2😨2👏1😭1
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
幹，超大
🔥20😱10🥰5😁5💩3🤔3😇1
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[新聞分享] - 美國宣布了科學重大突破，首次實現了核融合能量產出大於輸入 #為甚麼重要 美國首次實現了核融合能量產出大於輸入 #故事背景 以前就常常聽說甚麼核融合的技術，他是一個完全乾淨的清潔能源，不會有核廢料，也不會有多餘的汙染，且核融合所使用的燃料近乎無限，最後最重要的是核融合相較於核分裂很安全。但以前的問題就是運行核融合的所需能量會遠大於核融合所產出的能量。 #未來 雖然這個新聞看起來很聳動，甚至會讓人聯想到人類是不是真的再也不用為了能源稀缺而擔心了。但事實上應該還距離蠻遙遠的，首先每一家實驗室都可以這樣宣稱，因為每一家實驗室所計算的方法都不一樣，有些是連事前熱機能量也被計算進去輸入，有些是只計算核融合雷射那個瞬間的能量算輸入。甚至是核融合材料的不同等等。總之就是看到這個新聞雖然開心了一下，但細項應該還很多可以研究的，而我們距離真正的商業化核融合應該還很久。 順便推薦一下好看的科普頻道 : https://www…
👍17🔥2
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
[數據分享] - CPI 細項 預期：7.3%；實際：7.1%。 QoQ（%）： 食品：0.5 能源：-1.6 新車：0 二手車：-2.9 房租：0.6 醫療服務（上個月更新醫療保險後的數據）：-0.7
👍10
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
#每天寫點東西 靠邀==剛剛還沒寫完按到enter FSD Beta 10.69.3.1，北美全面上路實測影片，好的也講壞的也講，讚 Tesla AI day講一堆架構的東西看不懂沒關係，直接看消費者針對產品的使用體驗最直接。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Duoy7odWqFc / 目前個人自己覺得，市場對於「特斯拉」是車企與否的認知仍然呈現非常大的歧異，沒有對錯，但必須釐清。 在Twitter上，眾多Tesla投資者對於「交付量是多少」的癡迷呈現瘋狂，當然，如果你就認為Tesla是一家車企，那確實很重要，但我們退一步想，如果你今天認為Tesla是一家車企，那也不用管今年交付量達成率是40%還是43%還是CFO說的47%，現在的市值就值得你直接進場放空，所以我其實不太確定現在去針對短期內(0~6個月)的交付量去預測，又不斷調整那1~3%的差異是否是真的是有意義的事情。 雖然這其實是…
👍5
Signed Tim096|四面佛信徒
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tim961213. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
科技業外商人事凍結 and layoff 的趨勢很明顯，但台灣科技業的情況筆者真的很想知道，拜託各位知道大大投票~
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2022 to 11 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 839,777 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tim096 用資工的角度看投資” (@tim961213), 676 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tim961213.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.