Posted without readable text
custom 53507020358198339892

Channel
@tilicheeva_photographer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
251subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628214662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tilicheeva_photographer |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tilicheeva_photographer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 251 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 248 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 247 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 245 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 246 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 246 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350702035819833989 | 22 | 33.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| 🙈 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 9.23% | |
| custom 5431485289711289933 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5449442513616121857 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5355198673305216688 | 1 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
custom 53507020358198339892
Вчера с @senchenkova_o Создавали и снимали красивую нежность для шикарных Вадима и Рузили #домикФотографа
❤5❤🔥2
Неожиданно, но приятно засветиться на ТАКОМ уровне 🥰 Федерация шахмат России
🔥2custom 53507020358198339892❤1
Такие разные и такие очаровательные Красивая беременность для семьи @Nikita_Sergeevich1988 в моём уютном #ДомикФотографа Фотограф Ирина Тиличеева ❤️ Больше фото в комментариях 👇
custom 53507020358198339898custom 54314852897112899335custom 54494425136161218575
Как мы 🙃😉😊😀🥰🤣😊🤣 20 000₽ за 😍😄🙃😎 😃😊🙃☺️🤣😌🙃😄☺️😘 Увлекательная история, которая произошла с нами накануне: В саду, где стоит наш Домик фотографа. Инициативная группа предложила отсыпать дороги. Мы понимаем всю нужность этой инициативы. Оплатили 20тыс. А вчера вечером эта самая "инициативная группа" не долго думая (а может и долго, но врятли). Приняла решение ввозимыми камнями перекрывать дороги - прям напрочь блокироват…
🙈7🤔5👀2
По немногу отдаю фотографии девочкам с купания (работы с ними больше, чем на обычных съёмках)❤️🔥 Образ мифический и даже готический, но лицо держать сложно, потому что КОНЬ ПОД ТОБОЙ постоянно в движении и периодически ПЛЫВЁТ - эмоции восторга от купания зашкаливают и просачиваются 😃🔥 Девочки сказали, что это был просто верх наслаждения! Кто хочет испытать такие же эмоции - пишите, согласуем ещё фоторассветы
custom 535070203581983398910🔥8custom 53551986733052166881
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @tilicheeva_photographer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ирина Тиличеева Фотограф” (@tilicheeva_photographer), 251 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tilicheeva_photographer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.