Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тишь

@tihonZ

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

33,368subscribers

-139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001989691993
TypeChannel
Username@tihonZ
Created27 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tihonZ

Growth

33,36833,50733,437.56 August 2026 — 33,507 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,497 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,475 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,458 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,438 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,419 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,401 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,368 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,347–33,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:2633,368-33
11 Aug 2026, 21:3233,401-18
10 Aug 2026, 18:3333,419-19
9 Aug 2026, 15:1133,438-20
8 Aug 2026, 17:4233,458-17
7 Aug 2026, 21:1133,475-22
6 Aug 2026, 21:4633,497-10
6 Aug 2026, 09:4833,507first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 33,368 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,900
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held12 (19 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total21,830
Reactions total1,204
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
230
Videos
71
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12,011 reactions across 12 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,95149.5%
❤‍🔥2,13417.8%
🔥2,12917.7%
💘1,0278.55%
💋2001.67%
🥰1301.08%
🍓770.641%
730.608%
🤣560.466%
💔330.275%
😁270.225%
🙏220.183%
💊210.175%
🌚200.167%
👏190.158%
🕊180.15%
🐳130.108%
👍130.108%
👾130.108%
👎70.058%
7 further kinds280.233%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,011reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 12 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tihonZ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈8,430 views812 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

521💘125🥰86💔33❤‍🔥23💋8🙏7🤯5

29 Jul 2026, 05:48 UTC≈13,400 views392 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @vladimir_maslovPhoto

Ну вот, собственно. Школа кино Индустрия +🔍🔍 WELCOME https://industryfilm.school/storyproducing

❤‍🔥27372💊20💘128👏3🔥2🍓1

11 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC≈16,800 views2,375 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @tikhonzhiznevskiyPhoto

Фото: Паша Горевских

🔥1,400556❤‍🔥306💘34🍓28💋20🥰11👾7

21 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC≈22,500 views824 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @sobaka_ruPhoto

😘Тихон Жизневский: «Под соусом Тихона Жизневского зумеры получают основное блюдо в виде великого Александринского театра. И даже начинают читать книги» Главный краш театрального Петербурга, тяжеловес труппы Александринки и лауреат премии Собака.ru «ТОП50. Самые знаменитые люди Петербурга — 2026» стал суперзвездой «Ревизора с продолжением» — важнейшей премьеры года от президента театра Валерия Фокина! ⚡️В сенсационн

565❤‍🔥117💘95💋1710🔥9😍5👎3

5 Jun 2026, 21:11 UTC≈17,600 views496 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @mirohina_aPhoto

друзья мои, знаю, что сейчас все заняты пмэф, потому что там конечно же что-то очень важное, но я продолжу настаивать, что все неважно, кроме жизни человека Диме Поднозову нужна наша помощь ещё раз, ситуация серьезная, многие в курсе. Сейчас семье Димы очень нужны деньги, он находится в платной реанимации и ежедневное содержания там стоит немало. Я вас очень прошу отвлечься от всех своих горящих дел на 5 минут, нам

338❤‍🔥85💘44🙏15🍓4💋4🔥3🕊3

25 May 2026, 14:06 UTC≈17,500 views550 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @sobaka_ruPhoto

Собака.ru объявляет лауреатов премии «ТОП50»-2026 в номинации «Театр»! 😍 Елизавета Боярская, актриса 😍 MusicAeterna Dance, танцевальная труппа 😍 Тихон Жизневский, актер 😍 Григорий Чабан, актер 😍 Александр Сергеев, премьер Мариинского театра и хореограф 😍 Спектакль-застолье «Список Паперной», режиссеры и актеры #ТОП50_2026 ⭐ Telegram | MAX | VK

❤‍🔥357123💘487👏5🔥4🥰2🌚1

22 May 2026, 08:29 UTC≈17,700 views864 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @sobaka_ruPhoto

Тихон Жизневский, актер и лауреат премии «ТОП50. Самые знаменитые люди Петербурга — 2021». До церемонии награждения премии Собака.ru в 2026 году осталось 19 дней! Следите за премией здесь 😘 ⭐ Telegram | MAX | VK

🔥515207❤‍🔥102💘24💋6🍓4👾3🥰2

21 May 2026, 14:26 UTC≈16,400 views561 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @khabensky_fundPhoto

В сказках чудо не происходит случайно. Обычно это результат того, что люди объединяются ради чего-то важного. И 2 июня мы встретимся с вами в Зелёном театре ВДНХ, чтобы вместе прожить кое-что волшебное✨ На благотворительном концерте «Волшебная симфония в парке» в поддержку нашего Фонда искусство и помощь объединятся в свете тысяч свечей. Голоса народного артиста России и основателя Фонда Константина Хабенского, акте

403❤‍🔥8139💘20🔥6🥰5👍3🎃2

15 May 2026, 12:31 UTC≈16,500 views689 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @teatralnayaveshalkaPhoto

Последние три места на благотворительный вечер с Тихоном Жизневским. 4 июня, ресторан Taste Фонд Чистые души, средства уйдут детям. Бронь и вопросы @geo_812

💘414158❤‍🔥89💋11👏4🍓3🐳3🥰3

2 May 2026, 19:19 UTC≈22,300 views1,363 reactions3 Starsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @vladimir_maslovPhoto

ПИН 3000▪️

918❤‍🔥186💋120🤣56😁27💘23🔥16🙈5

26 Apr 2026, 08:47 UTC≈29,600 views1,603 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @vladimir_maslovVideo

Сходили с Иваном Филипповичем поугорать над Тихоном Игоревичем (Хлестаков) на "РЕВИЗОР с продолжением". Наш дал такого гротескного Эйса Вентуру, что мы пол спектакля проржали. Купите билеты и сгоняйте, не пожалеете)

1,080❤‍🔥269🔥158💘37🥰15🍓13💋12👍9

19 Apr 2026, 19:18 UTC≈31,600 views1,482 reactions4 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Тихон: Премьера фильма «Ангелы Ладоги» режиссер А.Котт оператор С.Астахов. С 23апреля во всех..)Спасибо всем!Спасибо деткам❤️ И огромная благодарность команде длт https://t.me/dlt_spb за мой нарядный наряд!)))❤️

1,010❤‍🔥246💘151🍓20🌚19🔥14🕊10🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tihonZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 328,039 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Жизневский, Тихон Игоревич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…спектакль-концерт «Оптимистическая трагедия»?] *Личный telegram-канал https://t.me/tihonZ {{ВС}} [[Категория:Актёры и актрисы Александринского театра]] [[Категория:Выпускники…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тишь” (@tihonZ), 33,368 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tihonZ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.