The Lost Soul Keep my exact facial features and identity unchanged. Standing motionless in a dead grass field. Large black coat. Wind blowing through hair. Crows flying past camera lens. Heavy clouds overhead. Black and white film photography. Melancholic mood. Cinematic depth. Photorealistic.

Channel
ذكاء اصطناعي .
@thol28
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,053subscribers
+375 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002327453578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thol28 |
| Description | رتب صورك منا 🤍 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thol28 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 9,053 | +360 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 8,693 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 8,678 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.8%
- avg views ÷ 9,053 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,790
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78,127 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 20
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 6
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 28 we hold a reading for · 21%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thol28. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
A realistic image of this girl, closely surrounded by a group of two-dimensional (2D) cartoon characters in their original forms: the Powerpuff Girls, SpongeBob and Sandy, Hello Kitty, My Pony, and Gumball. All the characters have slightly sad expressions and are hugging and comforting the girl.✨🤏🏻
Hyper-realistic, ultra-detailed close-up portrait showing only the left half of my face submerged in water, one eye in sharp focus, positioned on the far left of the frame, light rays creating caustic patterns on the skin, suspended water droplets and bubbles adding depth, cinematic lighting with soft shadows and sharp highlights, photorealistic textures including skin pořes, wet lips, eyelashes, and subtle subsurfac…
التركيز على الملامح والملابس (مرونة عالية): يحدد "غطاء رأس من الدانتيل"، وهو قطعة فنية تناسب أي وجه وتضيف طابعاً ملكياً أو كلاسيكياً فورياً. الوصف الجمالي (مكياج طبيعي ولكن محدد): يضمن أن تبدو ملامح الوجه رائعة دون أن تكون مصطنعة، وهو ما ينجح مع الجميع. الجو العام (كلاسيكي وعتيق): الأجواء "العتيقة" (Vintage/Sepia) هي نمط خالد (timeless) يضيف عمقاً وقيمة فنية لأي صورة، بعيداً عن الصور الحديثة المسطحة. تفاصيل النسيج…
Photo, posted without a caption
اعمل لي صورتي هذه المواصفات الشكل والمظهر الشخصية: تظهر في الصورة شابة ذات ملامح واضحة المكياج: يبرز المكياج بأحمر شفاه لامع باللون الأحمر الخفيف مع قلوس خفيف (أو الكرزي) وأحمر خدود (بلاش) وردي خفيف لون البشرة: تبدو بشرتها فاتحة. الملابس القميص: ترتدي تيشيرت قصير (Crop Top) بلون بيج فاتح أو سكري. يطبع عليه شعار وشخصيات فتيات القوة (The Powerpuff Girls) الكرتونية (بلوسوم، بابلز، وباتركاب). الجزء السفلي: ترتدي شو…
Photo, posted without a caption
اصنعععع ليييي صورهههه واقعيهههههه جداااا لأمره لاتغير ملامح الوجه حافض عليهاا رجائا بدون تغيرر ملامح الوجه حافض على ملامح. وضعية التصوير والحركة الزاوية: لقطة قريبة (Close-up) مركزة على الوجه والأكتاف، مع إمالة خفيفة للرأس إلى الأسفل والجانب، مما يعطي إيحاءً بالخجل أو "الاستغراق في الأحلام". الإضاءة: إضاءة ناعمة جداً ومركزة على ملامح الوجه، مما أبرز لمعان المكياج والغلوس، مع خلفية باهتة (Blurry) لتسليط كل التركيز ع…
صورة مقربة فائقة الواقعية لامرأة شابة غامضة تحمل قطة لونها بيجي أنيقة أمام النصف السفلي من وجهها مباشرة، ولا يظهر من فوقها سوى عينيها المعبرتين وجسر أنفها العلوي. لون الشعر والعيون نفس الصورة بدون تغير بدون تغير في الشكل والملامح وتكون واقعية 100/100
Photo, posted without a caption
اريدك تنشاء لي صوررررررااا واقعيههههه هواييي لاتغير ملامحي حافظ على وجهي الحقيقي كما هو الحال حافظ على ملامح الوجوه أو ملامح وجهي . اريد صورااا واقعية اكسر اضاءه ذكاء اصطناعي اريده واقعية فضيععع حافظ على واقعية صورا. وصف واقعي جدًا للصورة كما لو أنها ملتقطة بهاتف ذكي: صورة سيلفي عمودية واقعية لفتاة شابة داخل غرفة بإضاءة داخلية ناعمة. الفتاة تميل رأسها قليلًا إلى الجانب مع ابتسامة خفيفة وهادئة، بينما تضع طرف إصبع السب…
A young woman in a snowy winter atmosphere, wearing a black fur hooded coat and a thick dark red knitted scarf wrapped around her neck and partially covering her face, soft snow falling on her hair and hood, natural skin with a gentle cold blush, light-colored expressive eyes with tiny snow crystals on the eyelashes. Front-facing cinematic portrait with a calm deep gaze, Extreme close-up of the eye with ultra-detaile…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @thol28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 669,268 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ذكاء اصطناعي .” (@thol28), 9,053 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thol28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.