床=粘人板😇
Signed Rubicon

Channel
@thislight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001095601984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thislight |
| Description | 送你一把电子工钳和一首诗歌,留给我一个永远到不了的远方。 学生/全烂开发者/业余用户体验设计师;本频道会谈论政治观点。 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thislight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 33 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 33 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 14 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2024 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
床=粘人板😇
Signed Rubicon
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/05/generative-ai-runs-on-gambling-addiction-just-one-more-prompt-bro/ 这个理论挺有意思的。LLM聊天机器人的整个使用过程意外地与赌博相似。
Signed Rubicon
https://bgme.me/@gokurakutei/114569311554542593 所以……我可以解释为啥我只有7秒记忆了?!
Signed Rubicon
所以是这样对吧 source
Signed Rubicon
加班删文这个太搞笑了,乐 https://t.me/mightyflame/28997
Signed Rubicon
哈哈哈哈 https://wetdry.world/@esm/114140921809644769
Signed Rubicon
https://infosec.exchange/@JayeLTee/114057470165488882
Signed Rubicon
Mac应用众生相 天气.app Handshaker(已卸载) [空白图标] JetBrains s.r.o. Steam
😁1
Signed Rubicon
Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel 读了邮件,这个事情确实挺复杂的。 事情的起因是Abdiel想要提交一个Rust模块与dma有关,属于Christoph管理的dma子系统。这个模块抽象了一个dma内部功能,这个功能可能会有更动。 这个补丁更新了7个版本,在第8个版本。 Christoph不希望在dma子系统中接受Rust代码。他不想接受多语言的代码基,认为这会影响维护,降低可读性和可搜索性(这个模块是放在rust文件夹下的)。 Danilo提出Rust代码由他们自己维护,Christoph可以任意处理C API,哪怕不兼容了也由他们维护。 Christoph不接受。 Robin认为这个模块只是使用dma提供的API。如果出现问题也不会影响其它人,而且出问题了rust的人也会很乐意处理,这样的话应该没问题。 Danilo也…
👀1
Signed Rubicon
可不可以称之为乱加启发式算法的后果🌚实在是难以理解给每个API都加上Best-Fit自动转换的动机,我甚至不能理解为啥要把所有字符串都当作文字对待。 _(:_」∠)_ https://blog.orange.tw/posts/2025-01-worstfit-unveiling-hidden-transformers-in-windows-ansi/
Signed Rubicon
祝各位2025新年吉祥一箩筐!
Signed Rubicon
小米这个许可证感觉还可以写得严谨一点。参考一下其它许可证,比如AGPL就有让分发方法包含提供线上服务的条款。 For the avoidance of doubt, Xiaomi does not authorize you to use the Licensed Work for any other purpose, including but not limited to use Licensed Work to develop applications (APP), Web services, and other forms of software. 这里可以写“This license does not authorize to distribute the services of a modified work in any form, neither a form of software nor of over …
Signed Rubicon
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @thislight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 983,722 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rubicon的世界线” (@thislight), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thislight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.