Channel
@thisisnotafilm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
868subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001817165904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thisisnotafilm |
| Created | 15 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thisisnotafilm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 868 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 868 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,843 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
42 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 85.7% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1 день — 1 фильм. «Кто убил BlackBerry», реж. М. Джонсон (2023) Скоро в кино выйдет «Тони», я не бросаю попыток досмотреть «Шоу „Группы Нирванна“. Фильм». Может, с этой работой легче будет — канадский автор Мэтт Джонсон закрепился как один из главных инди-авторов в мире, и его популярность надо изучать. О чём: Группа гиков-разработчиков реализует идею объединить компьютер и телефон в одном устройстве. Так рождается…
❤1
1 день — 1 фильм. «Bulk», реж. Б. Уитли (2025) Поляризующее, освежающее в своей наивности кино. Режиссёр больших «Мег 2», «Высотки» и «Перестрелки» трипует на рельсах старой фантастики. О чём: Учёный заходит слишком далеко в своих экспериментах с теорией струн, что взрывает у коллайдера «brane» (не «brain»!). Кто-то должен разобраться в том беспорядке, что он создал. На поиски правды через силу отправляют журналист…
❤2
1 день — 1 фильм. «Миньоны и монстры», реж. П. Коффин (2026) Папо́й, ребята, папо́й. Лучшие миньоны — образовательные миньоны. Но на сборы это всё равно влияет отрицательно. О чём: История о том, как миньоны пришли в Голливуд, стали кинозвёздами, потеряли всё, выпустили в мир монстров, но потом объединились, чтобы спасти планету от хаоса, который они сами и устроили. Всё-таки по итогу для меня франшиза «Гадкий я» …
❤2
Нечаянный шедевр сюрреализма из сериала All That от Nickelodeon c участием Diddy — состарилось ОЧЕНЬ ПЛОХО
💔5
Posted without readable text
❤2
Ромдея наглядно
❤1💔1
@stepanburnashev умница — отличная международная история: https://t.me/kinopoisk_soon/26596
❤1
1 день — 1 фильм. «Мама, не горюй», реж. М. Пежемский (1997) Литературный памятник времени, который в этом времени и остался. О чём: Свадьба в провинциальном городке. В разгар веселья криминальный авторитет начинает приставать к невесте, чем приводит в ярость жениха, моряка. Бандиты и полиция решают посадить матроса, но он убегает и на его поиски отправляют полицию, киллеров, родственников и не только. Все ищут Мор…
❤2
Махершала Али не стал Блэйдом, зато стал Псом-Призраком.
❤2
Героиня саморазрушения 15 лет назад погибла КАТЕРИНА ГОЛУБЕВА, муза крупных режиссеров — авторов европейского кино, актриса с яркой харизмой и трагической судьбой. Кинематографистов привлекало не ее актерское мастерство, а удивительная психофизика и эмоциональная органика. Это лицо с печальными бездонными глазами раз увидишь — не забудешь. Один британский режиссер сказал: «В кино не так уж важно, хороший ли ты актер…
❤3
Прекрасная подборка фильмов на независимом фестивале Qyzqaras, который основала Малика Мухамеджан («Ласточка»). Событие пройдёт с 20 по 30 августа в городе Алматы. Открывается «Снами реки» Кристины Михайловой, закрывается «Подростковым сексом и смертью в лагере "Миазма"» Джейн Шенбрун. Между ними со всеми остановками: «Голубая цапля», «Память» Владлены Санду, Truly Naked Мюриэль д’Ансембур из Берлина, I See Building…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @thisisnotafilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 301,050 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“This Is Not A Film Channel” (@thisisnotafilm), 868 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thisisnotafilm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.