Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

W’s notes

@thewguy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002577391191
TypeChannel
Username@thewguy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/thewguy

Growth

9011 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 90 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 90 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:1711 Aug 2026, 23:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:3090no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:1790first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
2
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

251 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 58932515216503672949537.8%
custom 54381152073878324704517.9%
custom 53888809578916859563915.5%
custom 53074950986137734922911.6%
custom 6041766461339340712197.57%
custom 544969261815169599772.79%
🤔62.39%
custom 536392080269561718441.59%
custom 546781004863165856641.59%
custom 521332033855687008220.797%
👎10.398%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
311
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 16 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
200
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thewguy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2025 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 03:05 UTC328 views7 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Video

Их вообще получится цепануть с магаза..?

custom 53639208026956171844custom 52133203385568700821custom 53074950986137734921custom 60417664613393407121

Signed W

12 May 2026, 22:46 UTC558 views12 reactions200 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Случайны ли случайности? Многие люди живут и даже не задумываются, что в жизни нет случайностей. Но тогда почему, спросите вы, иногда появляются люди, с которыми не суждено идти рядом? Каждый человек в вашей жизни — это как портал в другую версию вашей жизни. Другой путь. Но не каждый путь предназначен именно вам. Это случилось, и вашей вины тут нет. Возможно у вас останутся чувства к человеку, и вы задумаетесь: «П

custom 54496926181516959977custom 53074950986137734923custom 60417664613393407122

Signed W

12 May 2026, 21:47 UTC363 viewsread 11 August 2026

Давно не излагал мысли, не умничал. Сейчас поймал мотивацию, поделюсь тут.

Signed W

9 May 2026, 22:58 UTC472 views10 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Эти часы для меня — больше, чем просто подарок. У них есть своя личная история. Когда я покупал сейлоры, у меня уже были часы именно этой модели, и они мне нравились. Из всего двух сейлоров, которых я тогда взял, как раз и выпал самый лучший сейлор. Тот момент я запомню надолго.😄 А поскольку мне этот волк очень сильно нравился, я решил вернуть себе частичку того времени — и купил эти часы. С тем же самым узором.

custom 54678100486316585664custom 54381152073878324703custom 60417664613393407123

Signed W

9 May 2026, 21:03 UTC451 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Собрал себе #махмутжон коллекцию😍🔥

custom 60417664613393407124

Signed W

6 May 2026, 17:22 UTC410 viewsread 11 August 2026

Новый флор: 🎁 - 💎 4,225 ($9,626) 🎁 - 💎 1,050 ($2,488) 🎁 - 💎 384 ($910) 🎁 - 💎 208 ($492) Подарки упали в $TON из за роста цены курса😯

Signed W

5 May 2026, 21:19 UTC422 views4 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

Тон растет, подарки падают. Кто радуется? У меня около 7-8к TON убытка на 🎁. С нынешним курсом $, это $14-16к. А случилось это потому, что я после хейта в сторону данной коллекции решил впервые вложиться в них, тк их называли надежным, называли лучшей коллекцией в тоне. Пару дней назад флор пепе был 7к+ тон, сегодня же - 5к. Все таки пепе не ТОП 1?

custom 54381152073878324704

Signed W

16 Jan 2026, 14:46 UTC≈2,450 views56 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Выглядит очень круто🔥

custom 589325152165036729431custom 538888095789168595611custom 543811520738783247010custom 60417664613393407122👎1custom 52133203385568700821

Signed W

5 Jan 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,540 views98 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Собрал коллекцию за 1211🪙 (2276$) А так же, взял анонимный номер +888 0404 1526 за 1688🪙 (3131$) 🎁В общем, взял по сумме двух сейлоров🤣 😎 - оно того стоило 💖 - надо было брать сейлоры

custom 589325152165036729464custom 538888095789168595625custom 54381152073878324708🤔1

Signed W

15 Dec 2025, 01:48 UTC≈1,400 views22 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

Почему умных людей не любят? Умный человек видит манипуляции, а это раздражает. Он задаёт неудобные вопросы и рушит иллюзии. В компаниях часто ценят лояльность, а не интеллект. Глупость объединяет, а ум – изолирует. Если вас не любят за ум – значит, вы опасны для чьей-то власти.

custom 530749509861377349211🤔5custom 60417664613393407125custom 54381152073878324701

Signed W

14 Dec 2025, 17:26 UTC≈1,000 views11 reactions102 Starsread 11 August 2026

О честности, совести и цене поступков Сегодня скам перестал быть редкостью - он стал частью нашей повседневности. Люди обманывают так легко и беспечно, будто это просто игра. Не задумываются, что за другой стороной экрана - живой человек, с чувствами, надеждами и своими проблемами. Но если отложить религию в сторону, остаются простые и вечные принципы, которые не теряют силы со временем: дисциплина и честь. Подума

custom 53074950986137734926custom 54381152073878324705

Signed W

8 Dec 2025, 15:58 UTC947 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Очень повезло купить это за 4500 Продавец очень сильный холдер, но из за нужды ему пришлось продать, а я поймал момент.😄

custom 54381152073878324704custom 53888809578916859563custom 60417664613393407122

Signed W

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @thewguy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 397,707 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“W’s notes” (@thewguy), 90 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thewguy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.