Channel
@theweirdoZzz
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
103subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002281550873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theweirdoZzz |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theweirdoZzz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 103 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 102 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 102 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (4 August 2026 β 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 350 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
36 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 15 | 41.7% | |
| π₯ | 12 | 33.3% | |
| π | 5 | 13.9% | |
| π₯° | 3 | 8.33% | |
| π€¨ | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
E ora parliamo di fellatio tra aracnidi In una specie parente dei ragni le femmine restie ad accoppiarsi la usano per aumentare le loro possibilitΓ di sopravvivenza coi maschi aggressivi Leggi tutto: https://ilpost.link/QEP0zDFBe7
π5π₯1π€¨1
βοΈβοΈ Altro Salticus scenicus Questo muro era pieno Mimetismo criptico perfettoπ±
π₯3π₯°2β€1
βοΈragnetto βοΈ Salticide Salticus scenicus
π₯5β€3
Ninfa di Nezara viridula Le ninfe sono gli stadi giovanili di insetti che non compiono metamorfosi completa, praticamente con qualche particolare in meno, sono giΓ dei mini insetti simili agli adultiπ±
β€3
Le vespe non servono a nulla e non impollinano πππππππ La cosa che mi ha colpito di piΓΉ in questa foto Γ¨ vedere come la Polistes abbia le antenne piene di polline, Γ¨ veramente carina, tra l'altro Γ¨ un segnale inequivocabile che non Γ¨ carnivora (da adulta si nutre di nettare, solo le larve lo sono) e invece Γ¨ laboriosa e impollinatrice come le cugine piΓΉ amate, oltretutto insieme ad altre piccole vespe solitarie che β¦
π₯°1
In questa immagine si nota molto bene la differenza tra l'apparato radicale delle piante spontanee e quello delle colture agricole. Γ un tema strettamente legato alla permacultura: radici profonde e diversificate migliorano la struttura del suolo, aumentano l'infiltrazione dell'acqua e favoriscono la vita del terreno, svolgendo in parte un ruolo simile a quello dei lombrichi nel renderlo piΓΉ poroso e fertile. Studi cβ¦
β€3
Nelle ultime settimane si continuano a vedere sui social richieste di identificazione di mantidi. Purtroppo spessissimo si tratta di una delle specie alloctone illustrata in questo carosello. β¬οΈ Questa guida intende dare uno strumento facilmente accessibile per il loro riconoscimento e un iter da seguire in caso di ritrovamento. Cosa fare se si trova una mantideβ 1οΈβ£ fare molte foto da piΓΉ angolazioni senza perderlaβ¦
π₯3
Bumblebees extravaganza. Here you can see a specimen of Bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) performing foraging behaviour on a Leguminosae flower. Thanks to the Greene Friends for this image! I wonder what all that nourishment tastes like... π πΈπͺ·πͺ¨ π€
β€5
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @theweirdoZzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 984,499 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ ππππππππππ ππ πΉβ Ιπ―β Φ πΌππ°πβ Ιπ―π΅π―Φ πΦ πΉβ πβ (@theweirdoZzz), 103 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theweirdoZzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.