Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Tumor Trail

Channel

The Tumor Trail

@thetumortrail

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

716subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002159277485
TypeChannel
Username@thetumortrail
DescriptionПро онкологию и сигнальные пути
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/thetumortrail

Growth

7166 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 716 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:16 — 716 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 03:176 Aug 2026, 16:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 715–717 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:16716no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:17716first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 716 subscribers
Avg views / post
214
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held20 (31 October 202519 July 2026)
Views total214
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
84
Videos
1
Links
141

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

306 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13142.8%
🔥6721.9%
🤯268.50%
custom 5328014489554002336165.23%
👍154.90%
🤔154.90%
🤓144.58%
👏61.96%
😁51.63%
custom 535742736619484909730.98%
😐30.98%
custom 539988862835885551820.654%
custom 541583804095215739720.654%
👎10.327%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC214 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#news Думскроллинг в интернете приводит обычно к двум вещам: 1. Либо ты полностью опустошаешь все свои запасы дофамина, натыкаясь на новости (если, конечно, твоя лента не забита напрочь котиками) 2. Либо ты находишь что-то интересное: от сопроводительных курсов по переезду в ОАЭ врачом, до курсов в IT по МедТеху; причем и то, и то в конечном итоге снова высосет дофамин, ибо со временем все равно приходит осознание

7🔥5🤯3🤔2😁2

16 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC262 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#evidence_based #offtop Ахах, знаете..; я с таким лицом сейчас набираю эти буквы в полпервого ночи и даже не знаю, что оно больше изображает: то ли смущение, то ли стыд, то ли радость от того, что во мне что-то вновь щелкнуло и двинуло вектор моих извилин в сторону онкологии (да неужели). На самом деле, извилины никак не перегибались, просто меня так в моменте расстроили все эти блокировки, ограничения и прочие про

14👏6🤯3custom 53574273661948490972custom 54158380409521573972

31 Dec 2025, 19:05 UTC818 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#offtop Знаете, довольно необычно встречать Новый год не дома, а на работе. Нечасто такое событие в жизни встречается, но меня поражает сама атмосфера, царящая в стенах мед учреждений: каждый пытается принести туда что-то, что будет соответствовать атмосфере текущего праздника. Кто-то приносит декорации на стены, кто-то заносит нарезанные салаты, кто-то даже подарки приносит… По сути говоря, все люди, которые были з

25🔥8👍4

11 Dec 2025, 18:26 UTC611 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#offtop Наверное, это самый долгий перерыв между постами за историю этого канала. Нет, я ещё пока что не умер/не спился/не сошёл с ума/не уехал в село по программе "земский доктор" и так далее; я всё еще тут. Последние два месяца года выдаются крайне насыщенными на события и крайне скупыми на свободное время (в которое я и занимаюсь обычно этим каналом), в целом, думаю, что такой прорыв сквозь пелену тишины не буд

🔥85custom 53280144895540023365

11 Dec 2025, 18:26 UTC715 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsotalks

​​#hso_talks #hsot_статья THE TUMOR ROAST: РЕЛАТЛИМАБ. ЧАСТЬ 2 Всем привет! 🔥 А вот и следующая часть нашей прожарки подоспела! Вместе с Александром Юдиным, автором телеграм-канала "The Tumor Trail", мы продолжаем разбирать культ вокруг релатлимаба и всей серии исследований RELATIVITY. Главный вопрос: почему история этого препарата – не про прорыв, а про важность воспроизводимости данных и жесткого критического а

🔥4👍2

18 Nov 2025, 17:28 UTC565 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#evidence_based Вот и вышла наконец-то рубрика, которая когда-то зародилась в моей голове неск месяцев назад. ВШО же помогла мне реализовать сей задумку. В первую статью про Релатлимаб я вложил много души и очень доходчивого и понятного текста, чтобы ввалиться в дебри медицинской статистики было удобно и не так сложно. Приятного чтения!

8custom 53280144895540023365🔥3👍1

18 Nov 2025, 17:28 UTC641 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsotalks

​​#hso_talks #hsot_статья THE TUMOR ROAST:РЕЛАТЛИМАБ. ЧАСТЬ 1 Всем привет! 👋 Вместе с автором потрясающего телеграм-канала «The Tumor Trail» и нашим коллегой, Александром Юдиным, мы будем безжалостно «прожаривать» культовые исследования, чтобы выяснить, так ли они хороши на самом деле 🤔 Первая жертва — релатлимаб и исследование RELATIVITY-047 🤓 В статье Саша выясняет 👀: ✔️не LAGает все-таки релатлимаб в лечении м

🔥15🤯43🤓3👍2

17 Nov 2025, 09:41 UTC588 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ответ на задачу №50: не, ну а чего гадость-то Я очень люблю томатный сок; однако часто его не покупаю, ибо полтора литра сока стоят под 150 рублей, а из-за его солености и вкуса, как говорят японцы, «умами» – выпивается чуть ли не за раз. Появление томатного сока в этом канале сопряжено с очень интересной статьей, которая попала мне в руки случайно. Я просто пролистывал ПабМед и увидел в заголовке «tomato», вот так

14🤯4🤓3👎1

16 Nov 2025, 17:59 UTC490 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Томатный сок ?

  1. Да, обожаю53%
  2. Нет, гадость47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7😁3😐3🤯2

16 Nov 2025, 17:59 UTC490 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#quiz 50 задача. Снова необычная тема. Но сначала, очень важный опросник. -------------- Задача №50: Любите ли вы томатный сок?

4🤔2🤯2

14 Nov 2025, 17:28 UTC539 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Сегодня пятница, 14.11.2025, и в эфире очередная новость "Кофе с Уилсоном". Сегодня в эфире: 👉🏻 https://telegra.ph/Izvestno-chto-antracikliny-vyzyvayut-kardiomiopatiyu-no-chto-naschyot-luchevoj-terapii--ili-kak-SAFE-FORWARD-ocenival-obluchenno-11-14

5🔥3custom 53280144895540023362

14 Nov 2025, 17:28 UTC474 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#news Сегодня пятница и как всегда (на самом деле далеко не всегда), пересылаю свою коротенькую новость с Уилсона. В последнее время как-то лениво стало делать посты, то ли потому что магнитные бури, то ли потому что я ленивый, пока не выяснил; но контент, уверяю, будет

6🔥3custom 53998886283588555182👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thetumortrail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Nov 2025, 17:59 UTCAnonymous Poll148 voters

Томатный сок ?

  1. Да, обожаю53%
  2. Нет, гадость47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2025, 20:09 UTCAnonymous Poll111 voters

ДНК-связывающий везикант

  1. Цисплатин23%
  2. Доксорубицин38%
  3. Паклитаксел14%
  4. Циклофосфамид13%
  5. Метотрексат13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2025, 05:42 UTCAnonymous Poll133 voters

(…)

  1. Понижению риска возникновения ВСЕХ опухолей и опухолеподобных заболеваний3%
  2. Повышению риска возникновения ВСЕХ опухолей и опухолеподобных заболеваний3%
  3. Не влияет на возникновение ВСЕХ опухолевых заболеваний6%
  4. Понижает риск возникновения ВСЕХ гормонозависимых опухолей9%
  5. Повышает риск возникновения ВСЕХ гормонозависимых опухолей15%
  6. Отдельно для каких-то опухолей повышает риск возникновения, для других - понижает64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,654 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Tumor Trail” (@thetumortrail), 716 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thetumortrail.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.