7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,139–12,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:23
12,165
-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:45
12,166
-5
9 Aug 2026, 09:53
12,171
+5
8 Aug 2026, 12:44
12,166
+6
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
12,160
+9
6 Aug 2026, 14:44
12,151
+8
6 Aug 2026, 05:07
12,143
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 12,165 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,600
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
43 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
111,779
Reactions total
6,825
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,290
Videos
≈156
Links
≈475
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,544 reactions across 36 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,417
43.6%
❤🔥
1,462
26.4%
🔥
455
8.21%
custom 5420406391506484743
421
7.59%
👾
179
3.23%
custom 5325607607061194560
130
2.34%
👍
120
2.16%
custom 5285338659413846416
99
1.79%
🍾
63
1.14%
😁
53
0.956%
🤯
43
0.776%
😈
31
0.559%
👏
19
0.343%
custom 5474363752113517077
16
0.289%
custom 5220149955032796740
12
0.216%
custom 5445321183257971445
12
0.216%
custom 5233690225980486355
7
0.126%
custom 5427342093674630148
5
0.09%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,825reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 43 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @therealtesli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ВИКТОР КРИВУЛИН
словно бы сталин воскресший,
рябое солнце над лесом
пахнет грибами лекарствами ржавым железом
потом дождем ожиданьем покоя
кровью зеленой
кровлей щебечущей несотворенной
над головою
Это восход или вечер? восторг или запад?
низко и кругло
солнце повисло похоже на голову куклы
скрытой за нижней границей за кадром
за горизонтом
розовый целлулоид
розовым светом подкожного слоя
озарено и вчера и наверное …
Вчера писал про Виктора Кривулина, сегодня вижу на Восстания.
Вообще, я как-то подозрительно попадаю в тренды в последнее время. То с трезвостью, то вот с интересом к 70-м…
Решил посмотреть, какая группа преобладает в моей коллекции. Нельзя было считать подарочные кассеты, например, полное собрание сочинений «Щенков», РЖБ, которые мне присылали коллеги с «Клюква Рекордс» или 12 кассет «Зимовья Зверей», которые мне презентовал звукарь «МОДа».
Результаты такие.
1 место — ПТВП. Возможно, Алексей Валерьевич мне какую-то кассету и дарил, но в основном, все покупалось на авито, мешке, р…
Какая мощная заруба у Fotballklubben Bodø/Glimt и Royale Union Saint-Gilloise (звучит как меню хорошего ужина). Я уж за просмотром Чемпионата мира и забыл, каким живым может быть футбол.
Читаю интервью Виктора Кривулина, где он говорит: «Ленинград конца 50-х был завален редкими изданиями старых поэтов. В библиотеках их никто не знал, а у букинистов все это стоило копейки. Я, например, в 60 году за рубль купил «Столбцы» Заболоцкого с автографом Тынянову. <…> Была, например, найдена на помойке книга Хлебникова, написанная рукой Малевича, с иллюстрациями Филонова».
До слез, как говорится. Впрочем, у …
13 августа 12:00 — билетов нет
13 августа 15:00 — 15 мест
14 августа 12:00 — билетов нет
14 августа 15:00 — 13 мест
«Странные совпадения усиливают эффект (читай кошмар)»,— писал Никонов в некрологе. Со Старковым так всегда. Когда я в первый раз вел экскурсию «Самоубийственный Петербург», была зима, на последней точке, на пересечении Мойки и Гривцова, заглох наш минивэн. Было очень холодно, мы прямо проникались тр…
Напоминаю, что «S.N.U.F.F» вышел в 2011 году, когда, может, про искусственный интеллект и говорили, но не очень-то часто и уж тем более не в том контексте, что он будет помогать в написании текстов. А Виктор Олегович, между тем, писал:
«Грым не знал точно, как работает доводчик — и никто толком не знал. Дамилола сказал только, что в нем заложен тот же алгоритм, что и в Кае — программа учитывает все, когда-то сказа…
«S.N.U.F.F.», конечно, должен уже настольной книгой стать:
«В конце концов передачу власти оформили по-другому: Рван Дюрекс дал прежнему кагану в ухо во время парада, и ему тут же присягнули ганджуберсерки с правозащитниками. Это, конечно, оскорбило оркскую интеллигенцию до глубины души, но Славу в те дни бомбили почти каждый день, бумажный маниту со страшной скоростью дешевел, и с верхними стилистами старались не…
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @therealtesli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 11,151 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максим Тесли” (@therealtesli), 12,165 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/therealtesli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
