Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Секир завидует

@soilwriter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,722subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244076545
TypeChannel
Username@soilwriter
Created7 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/soilwriter

Growth

4,6924,7224,7076 August 2026 — 4,692 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,692 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,699 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,707 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,722 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,688–4,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:434,722+15
9 Aug 2026, 19:014,707+8
6 Aug 2026, 21:154,699+7
6 Aug 2026, 05:004,692no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:594,692first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.1%
avg views ÷ 4,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,080
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held14 (22 May 202623 July 2026)
Views total6,250
Reactions total266
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,413 reactions across 14 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
83559.1%
😁18413.0%
🔥725.10%
👍422.97%
😱362.55%
🐳342.41%
🥰332.34%
302.12%
💔231.63%
🎃211.49%
🗿211.49%
🍓191.34%
💅130.92%
🌚120.849%
😢70.495%
💋60.425%
🎉50.354%
💯50.354%
🤩50.354%
🤣40.283%
2 further kinds60.425%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,413reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @soilwriter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,440 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bushebakeryPhoto

Грифоны едят булки, Сфинксы следят за городом Поговорили с писателем Антоном Секисовым про мистический и не очень Петербург! Можно ли встретить своего двойника в трамвае? В каких банях лучше подслушивать теории заговора? И почему на тебя могут странно смотреть, если ты вышел на пробежку? Об этом и многом другом — в нашем новом выпуске. 🗯Яндекс.Музыка 🎵 ВКонтакте 🤍и другие нишевые площадки

47👍19🍓9💋6👻3

15 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,160 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026

После похода к Юфиту захотелось посмотреть что-то бескомпромиссно безумное, и очень удачно подвернулся анимационный фильм Леонида Шмелькова “Непокой” (хм, где-то я уже слышал это название). История в неустаревающем и моем излюбленном жанре “полутриллер-полукомедия про странное место, из которого не получается выбраться”. Такие истории, конечно, подразумевают деятельного героя, и чем он деятельнее, тем лучше, но тут

59🔥9🥰6🌚3

15 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC≈2,650 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Давно не пытался разыскать могилу какого-нибудь симпатичного деятеля, и вот на прогулке с Вовой Седых спонтанно решили найти могилу режиссера-некрореалиста Евгения Юфита. По пути встретили могилу некоего Генриха Отчаянного, брата-близнеца Луи Си Кея. Кажется, эти имя-фамилию не переплюнуть — в лучшем случае может найтись что-то равновеликое. У могилы же самого Юфита, скромной и базовой, лежит какая-то связка из веток

71😁19🌚9🗿6

11 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC≈4,540 views228 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В прошлом году какое-то время прожил на Биржевой линии, возле памятника академику Сахарову. Это очень своеобразное место, довольно пустынное, там даже воды купить негде: вокруг только музейные или научно-учебные здания — Биржа, Кунсткамера, Пушкинский дом, корпуса СПбГУ и тд (прикладываю фото местных пейзажей). У писателя Дмитрия Горчева есть выразительное описание этой локации: Всякий петербуржец знает, что на стр

161🔥35💔20😁8🎃4

14 Jun 2026, 14:58 UTC≈2,990 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @StuffandDocs

Петербург, смерть и литература: анонс нового стрима В новом стриме в понедельник 15 июня в 20:00 Мск поговорим о Петербурге и литературе. О городе тревожном, смешном, кладбищенском, литературном и немного безумном. О Петербурге, где мертвые писатели почему-то живее многих, кладбища оказываются не концом маршрута, а его началом, а прогулка по городу легко может превратиться в абсурдное литературное произведение. Мои

28💔3🔥3🗿1

14 Jun 2026, 14:58 UTC≈2,410 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Анонсы грядущей недели В понедельник на стриме у дорогого Егора Сенникова. Подробности ниже а на выходных — на фестивале в Выксе. Если вы тоже будете там, то давайте вместе предадимся литскетчингу (еще недавно я понятия не имел, что это такое, но теперь знаю ответ)

10🔥2

4 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC≈3,390 views172 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А еще в этот короткий приезд в Москву произошел очередной смолток про петербургскую жизнь, который из раза в раз повторяется со мной в мельчайших деталях. Собеседник-москвич: — А ты в каком районе живешь? Я: — Васильевский остров. — Хм. А мне вот Петроградка больше нравится. После чего на лице москвича (всегда) возникает очень довольная улыбка — видимо, предполагается, что этой репликой он демонстрирует одновремен

😁10739🎃17🐳6🙈3

4 Jun 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,120 views116 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

К слову. Читая дипломные работы выпускников «литературного мастерства», вспомнил про очевидное: начинающий автор пичкает свой первый роман всем, до чего может дотянуться, всячески пытается заинтересовать читателя, и в итоге как раз получается нечто не очень читабельное. Как говорится, «мы или не мы». Предполагается, что, взрослея, автор уходит от внешних эффектов вглубь. Это не единственная траектория, но, наверное,

😁4830🥰27🐳6💯5

4 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,350 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ne_turgenevskayaPhoto

С председателем государственной экзаменационной комиссии магистратуры "Литературное мастерство" НИУ ВШЭ Секисовым Антоном Артуровичем профессионально разделили хачапури

74🐳10🤣3

4 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,270 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вот уж не ожидал, что когда-нибудь окажусь председателем чего бы то ни было. Видимо, поэтому и напрочь утратил связь с реальностью и забыл в «Сапсане» ноутбук (теперь вот пытаюсь его вернуть, общаясь с роботом из поддержки). Спасибо Майе Александровне Кучерской за приглашение.

😱3620🤩5🐳3🤣1

30 May 2026, 10:58 UTC≈3,350 views115 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

Принял непростое решение раз и навсегда стать болельщиком «Арсенала» еще в младших классах, в году примерно 98-м. Уже не смогу объяснить, чем тогда руководствовался. Вероятней всего, влюбился в них за романтическое лузерство, за красивую, но хрупко-уязвимую игру, которая почти никогда не приводила к большим победам. Теперь же они превратились в команду энергичных качков, которые играют с Реалом и Баварией с позиции

81🗿12🍓10😢7🎉5

27 May 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,760 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На контрасте вспомнил историю его жены Наталии Крандиевской. Прочитал про нее у Полины Барсковой (иноагент) в прекрасной книге “Седьмая щелочь”. Крандиевская начинала как поэтесса еще до революции, принадлежала скорее к символистским кругам, а потом встретила Алексея Толстого, была им поглощена и о своих литературных амбициях забыла на годы. Барскова пишет, что в 30-е годы Крандиевская очень переживала за бывших люде

68👍11🐳4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @soilwriter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,393 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Секир завидует” (@soilwriter), 4,722 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soilwriter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.