Channel
@theorem_i
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
655subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001711523278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theorem_i |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theorem_i |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 655 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 655 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
222 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 59.9% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 11.7% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 9.46% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 5.41% | |
| 💅 | 10 | 4.50% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 4.05% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.70% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.35% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.901% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Выпадала на почти месяц, потому что проводили с этим хипстером время в больнице. В очередной раз убедилась, что материнская интуиция существует и в вопросе детей нужно полагаться на своё мнение и свой опыт))) А вот уже после выписки сходила в кино на Майкла. Ну какой хороший фильм 🤌🏻 так приятно было посмотреть что-то такое вдохновляющее, пусть и оторванное от реальности — и пусть, грязи нам и в жизни хватает. Ну …
❤19👍2
Официально заявляю: это лучший выпуск натальной карты! Какой же Минаев потрясающе умный, его реплики нужно переслушивать по два раза, потому что практически в каждой — двойное дно. Обожать 💫
❤12
🥳Несмотря на все сложности (из-за моей непосредственной глупости) я всё же успела! Закончила редактуру и опубликовала конкурсный роман на Литрес. Эта история об инженере, который никогда не мечтал о космосе. Но когда позвали — согласился полететь, не раздумывая. Интересная, реалистичная история о том, какой будет настоящая первая лунная миссия: все цели, все задачи — настоящие. И всё описано максимально реалистично…
❤16
Ходила вчера на Дьявол носит Прада 2 И мне так хорошо на душе после этого фильма. Так приятно, что его не испоганили повесткой и мотивациями персонажей☺️ такая это редкость в наше время, чтобы продолжение не было шляпным.
❤22
Пересмотрела теорию большого взрыва впервые с финала, и будто заново прожила жизнь. Ненавижу это чувство опустошения, которое появляется, когда прощаешься с сериалом/серией книг😭 Как же необычно и приятно видеть вещь без повестки, без лишних акцентов… Думаю, что смотреть следующим. Какой у вас любимый сериал?
❤24
Кто-нибудь смотрел? Как вам? Вот уж не думала, что так зацепит наш сериал! По крайней мере первые серии 🤞 очень сильно надеюсь, что финал не сольется!
✍3
Повествование с флешбеками внутри главы:
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Меня тут только что просветили: оказывается, любой человек может подать заявку в космонавты через госуслуги! https://mai.ru/cosmos/ Вау
Очень маловероятно НО Может, есть тут человек, который не против почитать рукопись пусть не в черновом варианте, но где-то под чистовую отделку? Нет никаких требований к сложной оценке, просто интересно мнение живого человека, тк роман конкурсный. Научная фантастика, фантастика, космос
Блин, Это буквально то, о чем я мечтала в детстве! Никогда не понимала, почему она выбрала стать огром 👹
😁21
Мне сегодня 29))) и как же это приятно, что в свои 29 я уже не парюсь из-за какой-то хуйни и могу просто ее удалить и забыть! Боже какое облегчение. Лет пять назад я бы недели две рефлексировала )) С др меня кароч
🥰26💅10❤9
Кто-нибудь брал аскезу от покупок? На сколько вас хватило? Поразмыслив, я поняла, что из-за маркетплейсов вокруг меня столько ХЛАМА… что решила полностью отказаться от них. И это уже даже принесло небольшие плоды) И ещё осознанно отказываюсь от покупки игрушек где бы то ни было, даже с карты мужа)))) мне кажется, я компенсирую игрушками свое безигрушечное детство и этим врежу сыну 😬
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @theorem_i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Повествование с флешбеками внутри главы:
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 17 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 932,438 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Theoremi” (@theorem_i), 655 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theorem_i.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.