Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 21 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 02:24
250
-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:25
251
-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:17
252
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:18
252
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
54
72.0%
❤
14
18.7%
🔥
5
6.67%
👎
2
2.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2022 to 21 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
More about distribution of royalties
All funds received from royalties will have a dividend structure. At the end of each quarter we will fix the royalty amount. It will be distributed to all holders depending on the number of planets they have 📊
The same scheme with primary sales on the market.
Example:
The current royalty amount is 120 TON, and there are 150 planets in circulation. Consequently, if holder has 15…
We're back with some good news 🤭
First of all, we hope everyone has already noticed the addition to their wallets in the form of Ton Verse planets. The long-awaited mint is done! ✔️
Secondly, we want to tell you more about how the royalty fee will be distributed. All funds received will have a dividend structure and will be distributed to planet holders once a month.
Also we updated the functionality of our logger…
Our team is working on the minting feature, so our holders could interact with their planets directly in blockchain 😉
We added a feature to collect addresses directly in the TON Verse Explorer! Now our holders can set it in bot by clicking "Your address" button!
The TON VERSE team continues to work on the project. As of now, holders can see their NFTs and associated Rarity points at any given time.
As our project expands, so does our team. With a focus on the Verse ecosystem, we have prepared a road map. You will be able to see this road map in the near future!
Multi-use invoice.
Min amount: 10 TON
💬 Второй этап препродаж NFT коллекции TON VERSE!
На втором этапе реализуются 25 NFT
Стоимость 1 NFT - 10 TON 💎
В комментариях к оплате через @CryptoBot ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО указывайте свой кошелек в сети TON!
Кошелек для оплаты в блокчейне TON - EQAPH_neeRsevKimHsDUZndZSBpz23AVdZEcMJj11IuEk0Jf
В комментариях при переводе ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО указывайте свое имя пользователя Telegram в формат…
The second stage of pre-sales of the TON VERSE NFT collection starts less than 3 hours!
Also, you can participate in the AIRDROP
Conditions:
1️⃣ Subscribe to TON VERSE
2️⃣ Subscribe to TON VERSE EN
3️⃣ Invite one or more friends by invite link in боте
Good Luck! 💎 @TheOpenVerseBot
The second stage of pre-sales of the TON VERSE NFT collection starts tomorrow!
25 NFTs will be implemented at the second stage.
1 NFT - 10 TON 💎
By purchasing NFT, you automatically become a member of the closed club TON VERSE💰.
50 NFTs were implemented at the first stage.
You can track the payment history here @theopenverselog
100 NFTs AIRDROP by TON VERSE 🪐.
Let’s give away 100 NFTs! 🎁
🗓 16:00 (Mar 4) - 16:00 (Mar 31)
Conditions:
1️⃣ Subscribe to TON VERSE
2️⃣ Subscribe to TON VERSE EN
3️⃣ Invite one or more friends by invite link in bot
💎 More information you can find in the official RU and EN community 🪐
Good luck 💎
To participate in the AIRDROP you need to subscribe to the channels TON VERSE and the TON VERSE EN. It is important t…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @theopenverse_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@theopenverse_en named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@kkowinskii named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@theopenversechat named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON VERSE EN” (@theopenverse_en), 250 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theopenverse_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.