Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 313–323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:37
314
-1
10 Sept 2026, 17:16
315
-4
1 Sept 2026, 10:58
319
+1
24 Aug 2026, 10:13
318
+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:47
317
-5
8 Aug 2026, 14:43
322
+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:31
321
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:48
321
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 15s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
351 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
97
27.6%
😁
95
27.1%
❤
78
22.2%
custom 5362048677990899974
22
6.27%
custom 5316564927081618918
13
3.70%
😢
12
3.42%
💯
9
2.56%
custom 5359313475313081814
7
1.99%
🏆
6
1.71%
custom 5359329963692531646
4
1.14%
custom 5274206374765535221
3
0.855%
😎
3
0.855%
custom 5341399149541604671
1
0.285%
custom 5361701352575607587
1
0.285%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 6 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thenailka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 October 2025 to 6 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
По пути домой вспоминаю: а не позвонить ли в МЧС? Звоню. Диспетчер вежливо выслушивает мою историю, обещает помочь. Через пять минут получаю по смс инструкцию… которую я, оказывается, уже нашёл в интернете полчаса назад. Чувствую себя героем абсурдного квеста: собираю ртуть, звоню родственникам, вызываю МЧС — и всё это с температурой 39 и в шапке на босу ногу, почти.
А там — очередь. Огромная. Звоню Валере. Он совет…
Валера, видя мой психоз, подключает подкрепление — в созвон заходят другие ребята и начинают сыпать советами. От этого голова болит ещё сильнее, я потею и уверен: это уже ртуть берёт своё, медленно, но верно уничтожая мой организм.
Один советует рассказать всё соседям, другой — вызвать МЧС. А я просто хочу сбежать из квартиры. Но принимаю волевое решение: идти в магазин за скотчем. Выскакиваю на улицу, забыв застегн…
Я болею уже третий день. Температура пляшет: то опустится до 37,4, то взлетит до 39. Сил нет совсем — лежу, играю в мобильную игру с Валерой и Дмитричем. Параллельно решаю измерить температуру.
В самый драматичный момент — когда Дмитрич яростно кромсает виртуальных гусей, а 36‑летний Валера пытается подкатить к девушке‑айтишнице (видимо, в надежде, что она возьмёт на себя его профессиональные обязанности), — судьба …
🥊 Сегодня большая боксерская семья поздравила с юбилеем заслуженного тренера России Марка Ионовича Мельцера!
💪 22 октября Марку Ионовичу исполнилось 80 лет — целая эпоха, наполненная победами, достижениями и воспитанием чемпионов.
В этот праздничный день, а также в День тренера, мы выражаем глубокую благодарность Марку Ионовичу, а также всем нашим тренерам и наставникам за их преданность делу, за годы труда, мудрос…
Спустя 2 года увидел своего тренера, вернулся на некоторое время из Турции
Марка Ионовича Мельцера
Очень рад был его видеть, пообщались, пофилософствовали, посмотрели бои , посмеялись!
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @thenailka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
КИМЧИ ПОП ММА @kimchipopmma · 71,089 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Nail’” (@thenailka), 314 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thenailka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
