Channel
@themarketmethod
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003191391198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @themarketmethod |
| Description | multiple expert traders, all in ONE high-value channel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/themarketmethod |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 7 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @themarketmethod/6026 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC | @TraderGaulsVIP/127310 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @themarketmethod/6027 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC | @TraderGaulsVIP/127410 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @themarketmethod/6028 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC | @TraderGaulsVIP/127510 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @themarketmethod/6034 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC | @TraderGaulsVIP/127611 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @themarketmethod/6036 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC | @TraderGaulsVIP/127811 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @themarketmethod/6037 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC | @TraderGaulsVIP/127912 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @TraderGaulsVIP | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (10–0) |
| @uncoolgpub3 | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 7 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @CryptoPlanw. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 2 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
💥 Boom! Here's the Gauls Candle on $ETHFI 👉🏻 Price is now up 13% unleveraged while the overall market is still struggling. 🔥 This is exactly why patience matters. The setups won't all move instantly, but when the structure and momentum align, they can really deliver. Just stay patient and let the market do its thing and our all plays are programmed for this move.📈 We can do this thing in bad market now imagine on…
$WLD Buying Setup: Entry: CMP and 0.33 TP: 0.4 SL: 0.3229 Nice reaction in VAL reclaiming and higher #TraderGauls🎭
BTC Short-Term Hedge Trade Setup 🐲 BTC Short-Term Hedge Strategy I’m preparing a short-term BTC hedge trade to manage the risk of our currently running BTC short positions. 📍 Entry Zone I will look for a potential long/hedge entry within: $63,200 – $62,450 I will confirm the entry when price reaches this zone and the setup aligns with the trading plan. 🚨 Stop-Loss Stop-Loss Zone: $61,730 This is a tight-risk s…
Photo, posted without a caption
MY #ONDO BUY SE-TUP My Risk Management 👉 Spot + Leverage: 2x to 3x Only 👉 My First Entry: CMP ($0.3353) 👉 My Second Limit Entry: $0.3245 🚨 My Stop Loss: (#0.3185) Zone (Tight Risk Management) 🎯 Profit Management 👉 As marked on the chart, I will book 25% profits at each Take Profit (TP) level . My Beloved Members, ONDO has already pumped 2% from my previous mentioned zone. Now I will take an entry here. Let’s…
📊 $JTO Trade Update Look at the market… and look at the Gauls plays. 👀 👉🏻 $JTO is now up 8% from our entry, more than 1RR. ✅ 👉🏻 Booking partial profits here and making the trade risk-free by moving the stop to entry. 👉🏻 As long as price holds above 0.58, the structure remains strong and higher coming on it Cheers 🥂 Show some love, ser! ❤️ We’ve been delivering one top gainer after another. Disclaimer: This conte…
🚀 Finally the Wait Is Over! The Trend Checker Dashboard is now live! This dashboard helps you avoid emotional trading by tracking the trend of every coin across multiple timeframes, from 15M to 1W. Instantly spot the strongest trends, compare timeframes, filter sectors, and focus on high probability setups. Remember, one bullish candle doesn't make a trend. Follow the higher timeframes and let the data guide your …
$GOLD Major Update: ➡️ after two months of consolidation, Gold is finally reclaiming the 4400$ level + VAL that is the good sign so far ➡️ Until my Box hold we can expect next 4700 and even 5000+ in upcoming months ➡️ I've bought Gold for Swing in 4300-4400 region digitally and physically bought some at 4000s ➡️ The Plan is simple and Easy: Digitally: Going with invalidation tight Stop below the box Physially: Buy i…
$INJ Buying Setup: 👉 Entry: CMP 👉 Target: VAL 5.463 👉 SL: below last low 4.273 Setup looks clean let’s execute it #TraderGauls🎭
$INJ Strong Eye on it: ➡️ right now it's below the VAL that is our oversold zone ➡️ also on LTF it's making b patttern that is positive thing too ➡️ For now I'm waiting for a breakout from the local resistance for the trade oppurtunity Keep eye on that level and hit like if you want these types of updates before sharing the Trade #TraderGauls🎭
$TIA TRADE UPDATE: 👉 Closing it here in minimum loss after filling both entries 👉 -3% with 0.5RR loss 👉 Till yesterday I stick to my plan because it has strength and did nice reaction to VAL but not it loosing the strength so better to close in small loss Much better opportunity ahead Disclaimer: This content is for educational and informational purposes only and is not financial advice. I am not a licensed financ…
🔥 MY BELOVED ARENA MEMBERS — $ONDO UPDATE 🔥 I told you about $ONDO and the levels given on the chart. ONDO dropped from around $0.4288, while the key level I had marked on the chart was around $0.444. Currently, ONDO is down around 20% from those levels. People need to understand one simple thing: nothing moves in a single direction. There are always ups and downs — and those moves create the levels we need to tra…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @themarketmethod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Market Method ™” (@themarketmethod), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themarketmethod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.