Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

thelarpchannel

@thelarpchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

615subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004332380370
TypeChannel
Username@thelarpchannel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thelarpchannel

Growth

6076156116 August 2026 — 607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 607 subscribers14 August 2026 — 615 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 606–616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:15615+8
6 Aug 2026, 17:47607no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:00607first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
212.9%
avg views ÷ 615 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held17 (14 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total19,644
Reactions total2,085
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,298 reactions across 17 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
80134.9%
💘24210.5%
🍓1747.57%
custom 53616944290883600141265.48%
👍1255.44%
🔥944.09%
custom 5359812086656443956934.05%
custom 5361861683704799241843.66%
❤‍🔥682.96%
🥰632.74%
custom 5289822600975915899572.48%
🌚532.31%
custom 5359405263059203344502.18%
custom 5368740451786462820451.96%
💋401.74%
custom 5359468566582173585210.914%
👏190.827%
🤔170.74%
🌭150.653%
😁140.609%
20 further kinds974.22%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 17 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thelarpchannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC554 views97 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

дяка за 600 папищеков,реквест пост хотите чи не

💘4326👏19🍓4🌚2💋1custom 52897028401078348861custom 52898226009759158991

31 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,160 views159 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

по аушке кеги

78custom 528982260097591589935🔥18💘7custom 53598120866564439566custom 52920693155483271734🆒3custom 53616944290883600143

30 Jul 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,020 views95 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

не забывайте про рулетку на цветной скетч !! учавствуйте пока время есть

🍓46💘18🔥136👍3custom 53618616837047992413🎉2custom 52898226009759158992

27 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,210 views145 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

пишите числа для рулетки без флуда . . РУЛЕТКА НА ХАЛЯВНЫЦ СКЕТЧ РЕБЯТ ХАЛЯВНЫЦ ЦВЕТНОЙ СКЕТЧ актуально

💘68🥰30🍓246custom 52898226009759158995custom 52897028401078348864🎉2🏆2

25 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,130 views138 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ребята го реакты и будет рулетка на халявный цветной скетчч

64custom 536169442908836001429👍21💘8custom 52917604902198706364custom 52920693155483271734custom 52898226009759158992custom 53594685665821735852

25 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,230 views139 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

веня эмбриончик

73💘31🤔17custom 53598120866564439566🎃3custom 52898226009759158993custom 53616944290883600143🆒2

24 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC≈1,190 views200 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

новые реакты тапните ай лове фриска

custom 536169442908836001472custom 53598120866564439565534custom 52898226009759158999custom 52897028401078348867custom 53594685665821735857custom 52917604902198706365custom 52920693155483271734

23 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,200 views121 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

50🥰24💋20👍6custom 53594685665821735855custom 53618616837047992415💘4custom 53598120866564439564

23 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,070 views197 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026

реакция если любите этот тгк

93custom 536186168370479924143❤‍🔥31💘12custom 53598120866564439565🎉3custom 53593740601217971693custom 53616944290883600143

23 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,240 views163 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩

84🍓35🌚23💘8custom 53598120866564439564❤‍🔥3custom 536169442908836001432

22 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,300 views121 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

TW: BLOOD

🍓58🌚26🌭15😭65💘5💋2🎃1

20 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,600 views134 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

всем ар дяку за 500 падпищекаы ХАРЭ ОТПИСЫВАТЬСЯ АЛЕ

79🔥20👍14💘4custom 53598120866564439564custom 53616944290883600144custom 53618616837047992414🍓3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @thelarpchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 293,709 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“thelarpchannel” (@thelarpchannel), 615 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thelarpchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.