Posted without readable text
💩24❤14👏5🎄1🤮1🦄1😁1
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags

Channel
@thejournalofbags
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
181subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002037367707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thejournalofbags |
| Created | 21 October 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thejournalofbags |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 181 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 182 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 182 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
641 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 215 | 33.5% | |
| 🔥 | 129 | 20.1% | |
| 💩 | 101 | 15.8% | |
| 👎 | 51 | 7.96% | |
| 🤡 | 43 | 6.71% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 3.43% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 2.96% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 1.25% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 1.09% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.936% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.936% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 0.936% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 🎄 | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.468% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.468% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.312% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.312% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.312% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.312% | |
| 3 further kinds | 4 | 0.624% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 641reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2023 to 4 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
💩24❤14👏5🎄1🤮1🦄1😁1
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
💩30❤27👎19🔥12🎉5🤮5🎄4🥰2
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags
2m Think this goes much higher https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x51b3832e54406e6653644a7b8497c9826eca400a
👎24💩20🤡7🔥3👍1
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags
Bidded Neuralink here Looks like Elon will be hyping up this tech going forward Telepathy is the new product but Neuralink is the base layer so I think it will send much higher All new products lead back to Neuralink 0x65Ee1361596439664059D1a5EF44014D08c95693 https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x51b3832e54406e6653644a7b8497c9826eca400a 1m https://t.me/neuralink_portal
💩20🤡12👎8🔥7❤1
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags
Just paid off my Mum's mortgage I am now poor again On the lookout for gems to make it all back
❤82🤡24🥰9💩7🕊6🙏3🔥1
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags
Happy New Year you damn dirty apes 2024 is our year
❤35🥰8🔥6🍾3🤝2🎉1
Signed I Hold (tea) Bags
For a less degen trade, I would advise loading up on $XEN between now and the New Year, and keeping hold of it for 6-18 months. It's a token that launched a year ago and which people could mint for the cost of gas (in multiple wallets) - one year mints are still in profit, despite supply coming into the market everyday and it being a forever down token so far. Everyone has been told to mint not buy (because you get…
🔥16✍5❤4👍3🥰1
Signed I Hold Bags
Grok at 100m will be 2000x for Bag Holders Time to stop counting, but send it to a billy or more Even if you missed, this is good for everyone Will usher in printor season Scan the chain, search for gems with narratives, ape sensible amounts when you see a good risk:reward, and be cautious not to fomo into green candles (unless it's a new Elon dog, that is) There are many mooners to come and capital preservation…
❤22🔥9🙏4👍2🥰2😍2😭2😁1
Signed I Hold Bags
Channel photo updated
Did a second spin, congrats @Maruti21
🔥8❤5
Signed I Hold Bags
Prize draw done - winner is @johngletah
❤6👍5
Signed I Hold Bags
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thejournalofbags. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@thejournalofbags named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bag's Research and Reflections” (@thejournalofbags), 181 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thejournalofbags.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.