Channel
@theheckistislecreatura
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201664327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theheckistislecreatura |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theheckistislecreatura |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 36 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 35 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 35 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 🍓 | 9 | 29.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 16.1% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Разве что в ближайшее время мне предстоит делать дофига и больше. Большинство вещей вовсе непоправимы, но хотя бы не закончились совсем дурно. ...мне остаётся только ценить то, что у меня было, моменты с людьми, которых явно придётся отпустить и двигаться дальше. Сделать выводы, не брать того, чего не тяну, не стыдиться ошибок, неудач и внимательно следить за своим состоянием – даже если я могу, умею и практикую, с т…
❤4
Я удалила аккаунт с hh. Моя менталка в щепки. Многое не в порядке. Я просрала шанс второй раз пройти на бюджет просто не успев подать согласие и врядли кто-то откажется от места на желанном направлении. Я подвела Нафаню, не только его и теперь мне только и остаётся, что возиться с последствиями. Подробности...? Их не будет.
ТАГ ЙОРСЕЛФ 😍😍😍😍😍🥰🥰
у меня был период в жизни, когда я одевалась по эстетике потопления кустарной подлодки с миллионерами
У меня к вам вопрос в каком формате сделать публичные листы ожидания? Чтобы все видели, что в процессе, я обо всём помню и на каком этапе параллельно коммуникации лично.
🍓2
хотя бы я поняла, как строить шары
я отвлеклась, пытаясь понять, как штриховать шары
🔥4🍓2✍1
Итоги «чардиз ивента»! Суть в том, что участники составляли коллажи, которые потом тасовались между ними в случайном порядке. После, по попавшемуся коллажу люди придумывали дизайн персонажа. Собрала видео с их процессами, рассуждениями и просто хихишками :) Спасибо всем за участие и просмотр! Авторы: Mollisha @MlshaSova Мракобеска @theheckistislecreatura oneiroi @onyastupid Honespy @honespyissuffering KYCOK DEDA @ky…
первый купленный адопт у меня^^ учавствовала в челлендже с созданием персонажей по мудбордам каждый участник сделал мудборд и позже, в произвольном порядке, эти мудборды распределились по другим участникам. Мне достался очень интересный, с жутковатой морской тематикой. А я давно хотела жуть попробовать сделать
🔥4🍓1👻1
Алиса: бля, мб построение и затащила, но на штриховке я соснула хуйца Тоже Алиса: чего нахуй? Я шла на экз по приколу, чтобы потом на других творческих испытаниях не нервничать. Рисовала голову Апполона.
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2🍓1👻1
в перерыве работы над коммишкой
🌚2🍓1👻1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @theheckistislecreatura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@theheckistislecreatura named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мракобеска” (@theheckistislecreatura), 36 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theheckistislecreatura.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.