Channel
@thegridchina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
165subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002774174975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thegridchina |
| Description | Нина Гридчина, head of strategy ((SETTERS)) и создатель стратегической студии the grid в Вене. Сочетаю Австрийский слоу-лайф и Московский хасл. Тут про стратегический маркетинг и попытки балансировать между двумя крайностями. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thegridchina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 165 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 165 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 162 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (10 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,672 |
| Reactions total | 187 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
193 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 116 | 60.1% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 18.1% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.18% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 4.15% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 3.63% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 3.63% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.59% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наташа Бедингфилд очень много сделала для этого мира Я считаю что лучший способ оставить след в этом мире - повлиять на людей вокруг в лучшую сторону. Поднять настроение, рассмешить, вдохновить, приободрить. Если ты сделал чей-то день, сделал его чуточку лучше, то твой день прожит не зря. Даже если это не ты лично, а плод твоего труда И, мне кажется, в этом отношении Наташа Бедингфельд сделала для этого очень мн…
❤2
Do the work, then frame it Это напутствие Марка Полларда в начале карьеры навсегда изменило мой поход к работе. В стратегии есть такое понятие — «дорогие слайды». Это всякие схемы, таблицы, фреймворки. Иногда кажется, что в этом и есть твоя ценность — знать и уметь пользоваться всякими умными методами. Но иногда (часто) в этом теряется суть. Об этом поговорила в новом видео в коллаборации с SETTERS и Setters Educ…
❤13👏5🔥3
Если я когда-нибудь уеду из Вены, то только в Амстердам (или Тайпэй!)
❤21👍2🔥2
Тяжело быть ПДРом Можно что угодно говорить про мышление роста, как круто быть в окружении тех, кто лучше тебя… Но если вы тоже ПДР — Перфекционист-Достигатор в Ремиссии, то прекрасно понимаете, что настоящее испытание — быть последней в групповом заезде и знать, что 12 уберменшей ждут тебя на вершине уже 30 минут. Если вы смотрите мои социальные сети и, из-за постов про спорт, вам кажется, что я в хорошей форме, …
❤22🏆7🔥7
Перед важными событиями мне снится один и тот же сон: Спустя 10+ лет после выпуска из школы, я обнаруживаю что я не досдала какой-то предмет: математику, физику, биологию. Что-то, в чем я никогда хороша не была, а сейчас и подавно все забыла. И этот «хвост» блокирует меня от следующего шага - не могу устроиться на работу, защитить диссертацию, подписать важного клиента. Я трактую эти сны, как тревогу о невыполненн…
❤12❤🔥7👍4💯3
Я стою скрученная в бараний рог, но это поза ящерицы. Руки трясутся, со лба капает, ноги угрожают отказать. Не так я себе представляла йога-стретчинг! Ну ты же хотела вернуться в свое тело? Это не то, чего ты хотела, но, возможно, это то, что было нужно. - попыталась я себя успокоить. В работе и жизни такое вообще постоянно бывает: Думаешь, что для начала своего проекта нужно уйти из найма и уехать в Тибет на мес…
❤18👍2
Video, posted without a caption
❤2👍2🔥2
Нужно всего лишь зайти в @easylecturebot и выбрать саммари. Я считаю, надо брать!
💯2❤1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥7
Она сошла с ума — подумала я, когда ментор по публичным выступлениям сказала выступать без слайдов на лекции в сообществе изионистов. «Она точно сошла с ума» — (вероятно) подумала Катя, продюссер сообщества изионистов, когда я объявила о своем решении. Знаете, я очень неплохо выступаю. Не Тони Роббинс, конечно. Но всегда считала это сильной стороной. Но я из рекламы. Для меня слайды — естественная среда обитани…
❤19🔥13🥰8
Если вы гуру медийных инструментов — это шикарная возможность поработать вместе 💖
❤2
Иногда мы ищем не просто нового коллегу, а человека, который сможет развивать целое направление. Сейчас в SETTERS открыта вакансия Head of Digital Distribution. Эта роль для тех, кто умеет видеть возможности раньше других, строить сильные digital-решения, работать с командой, продуктом и бизнесом одновременно. Со своей стороны — топовые проекты, свобода запускать новые продукты и механики, влияние на развитие аген…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @thegridchina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 280,824 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“зе гридчина” (@thegridchina), 165 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thegridchina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.