Channel
@thefly7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596649566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thefly7 |
| Description | Сбежала из кино |
| Created | Between 1 September 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thefly7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 57 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 57 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 27.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5388684896929593440 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 12.3% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 9.23% | |
| custom 5388977792224342481 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| custom 5388880957891685956 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5388888315170665675 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я очень недавно (буквально неделю-две назад) открыла для себя эту песню, Любовь с первого взгляда🥹 green apelsin - охота на лисицу
❤🔥6custom 53886848969295934401custom 53888883151706656751custom 53889777922243424811
Когда в зал врывается главный фанат твоей песни😃🫠🤲
🔥5custom 53886848969295934402custom 53889777922243424812
Тимофей @motivlll , хоть и не Андрей, но он очень хороший специалист!
custom 53886848969295934405🐳1custom 53888809578916859561custom 53889777922243424811
Вот так камень под стулом вдохновил меня на написание целого поста, а это мне совсем несвойственно))
❤2
🗿Я приглядела камень под стулом ещё в начале квартирника, он зацепил меня с первого взгляда. Этот камень под стулом меня очень позабавил, потому что там не просто камушек, отвалившийся с чьей-то подошвы, а реально камень) И он не на стуле сидит, как зритель, а под стулом, видимо прячется от толпы. Я не нашла более подходящего момента сообщить об этом камне, чем в этой яме) Тем более из +- 25 человек к моменту моего …
🗿6
Вы не поверите, я решила что-то выложить😅
custom 53886848969295934402
Опачки
custom 53888809578916859561
Тисс и Ша’арнез по пути разбитого сердца 💔 #сагаогрозах @shater_shuta
❤4
Ну всё, я в любви🥹😍Это лучшее видео, которое я сделала, ну как минимум за последние пол года точно😅
Муха pinned «Делюсь с вами этим потрясающим проектиком🥹 Анимацию сделала Ирина @nimiget 🌌 Как я рада, что просторы интернета познакомили меня с её творчеством! Небольшая предыстория) Ещё в мае я написала песенку, вдохновившись образом одного из главных героев (хехе) истории…»
Спойлерчик к новому видео) Я опять опоздала с трендом😢
❤🔥4
Мой любимый кусочек в песне🥹 Спасибо @nimiget за чудесную анимацию!♥️🌌 Послушать песню целиком и налюбоваться анимацией можно здесь: https://youtu.be/JTsVGjSsgfE?si=Qpm4WXFO99zG8bXN
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @thefly7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 432,756 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@thefly7 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Муха” (@thefly7), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thefly7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.