توی پیش گفتار کلی چاسر، شخصیت مادر روحانی یا راهبهٔ دنیای کنتربری تیلز رو ساده، فروتن و در تبسم باحیا توصیف میکنه که توی پاورق کتاب راجع بهش نوشته خندیدن برای راهبهها مکروه بود و مقررات و عرف صومعهها ایجاب میکرد که راهبهها خندهی خود رو مهار کنند و در صورت خندیدن این کارشان بیصدا باشد. سرکلاس زیاد درباره ویژگیهای چاسر که اون رو از نویسندههای هم دورهاش جدا میکنه صحبت کردیم و چاسر در کنار هوش و ذکاوت تیزی که …

Channel
eerilyschtum.
@thedamselindistress
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
378subscribers
+208 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004406622856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thedamselindistress |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thedamselindistress |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 378 | -86 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 464 | +146 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 318 | -35 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 353 | +236 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 117 | -52 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 169 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 170 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
“Ther was also a nonne, a prioresse, that of hir smylyng was ful symple and coy; hire gretteste ooth was but by seinte loy; and she was cleped madame Eglentyne.” — The Canterbury Tales, by Geoffrey Chaucer
Video, posted without a caption
“Threading, the glacier head, looking hard for moments of shine from twilight to twilight, aurora, goddess sparkle, shoot me beyond this suffer, the need is great, aurora, aurora, goddess sparkle, a mountain shade suggests your shape, I tumbled down, on my knees, fill the mouth with snow, the way it melts, I wish to melt into you, aurora, spark the sun off, spark the sun off, spark the sun off, spark the sun off, spa…
File, posted without a caption
— Breakfast at Tiffany's, 1961 Dir. Blake Edwards
also, sorry for holding grudges. it's not something i can help.
even though i've shown how much I struggle with this kind of behavior, people keep doing the very things that make me feel annoying and insecure. so all I'm left with is questioning the whole relationship from beginning to end. there's nothing more innocent than someone who's so discombobulated that they're desperately trying to figure out whether their so-called friends hate them or not.
i've always believed that you are your friends. no one can really be that different from the people they choose to surround themselves with. if you didn't have anything in common with them, or if you didn't approve of the way they are, you probably wouldn't be friends with them, right?
and if someone has shitty friends, does that mean they're a shitty person themselves? because i've always thought of them as someone very sweet and precious, but their friends clearly hate my guts, and they're also very pretentious and judgmental. does that mean this friend of mine is a shitty person as well?
so i'm trying to wrap my head around something i've been struggling with for quite a while now. if someone treats you as if you're a freaking dirtbag but continues to hang out with you, even though they've made it clear that you're not their priority when it comes to friendships, does that mean they actually want to be friends with you, or do they hate your guts?
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @thedamselindistress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eerilyschtum.” (@thedamselindistress), 378 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedamselindistress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.