Channel
@thecuriousloop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
192subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001373008992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecuriousloop |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecuriousloop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 192 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 194 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 194 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2024 to 21 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Accountability sinks | A Working Library In The Unaccountability Machine, Dan Davies argues that organizations form “accountability sinks,” structures that absorb or obscure the consequences of a decision such that no one can be held dire... https://ift.tt/gbrIMCW #accountability, organizations
Signed IFTTT
You Don’t Need Words to Think Brain studies show that language is not essential for the cognitive processes that underlie thought https://ift.tt/X2xH0yG #brain, cognitive, thought, cognition, thinking, language, research, consciousness, science, psychology, neuroscience
Signed IFTTT
She’s One of Florida’s Most Lethal Python Hunters—but the Invasive Creatures Still Have a Hold on Her Donna Kalil has plunged into canals in the dead of night, straddled two-hundred-pound serpents, and been bitten more times than she can count—all in the name of killing a thing she loves and playing a game she can’t win https://ift.tt/g1uYb5H #
Signed IFTTT
Why Don’t We Use Awnings Anymore - The Craftsman Blog When you look at old black and white pictures of cities from before the 1950s you may notice something on most buildings that are no longer there today. Awnings. They were ubiquitous over nearly every window of buildings from the most basic single family home to massive buildings like The White House. Where did all […] https://ift.tt/L4GABd0 #architecture, desi…
Signed IFTTT
Reflections on Palantir A retrospective of an eight-year stint. https://ift.tt/ORncUmV #tech, company culture, Big Data, AI, Data Analytics, Company Culture, Defence/Geopolitics, Bookmarks, Tech, Palantir
Signed IFTTT
Let Google Decide https://ift.tt/1r4xMkS #
Signed IFTTT
Why does FM sound better than AM? Frequency modulation (FM) is more robust to noise than amplitude modulation (AM) because static itself is primarily a form of amplitude modulation. https://ift.tt/GXun2Mi #audio, radio, technology, modulation, sound quality, electronics, fm
👍2
Signed IFTTT
stormrider https://ift.tt/jXK1ecv #Focus
Signed IFTTT
धर्मादर्थः प्रभवति धर्मात्प्रभवते सुखम्। धर्मेण लभते सर्वं धर्मसारमिदं जगत्॥ *भावार्थ:* धर्म से धन उत्पन्न होता है, और धर्म से सुख उत्पन्न होता है. धर्म से व्यक्ति इस संसार में वह सब कुछ प्राप्त कर लेता है जो धर्म का सार है. विजयादशमीपर्वणः हार्दाः शुभाशयाः
The Disappearance of an Internet Domain How geopolitics can alter digital infrastructure https://ift.tt/yqhAYKr #Geopolitics, Internet, Domain Names, Digital Infrastructure, Politics, Technology, Online Security, Cybersecurity
Signed IFTTT
On the Nature of Time—Stephen Wolfram Writings Stephen Wolfram takes a computational view of time, defining it abstractly, and the implications from computational irreducibility. https://ift.tt/hzguHw7 #time, computation, stephen wolfram, computational irreducibility, physics, philosophy, science, wolfram alpha, complexity
Signed IFTTT
Who died and left the US $7 billion? It was the biggest estate-tax payment in modern history, but no one knew who made it. Then an anonymous phone call pointed to one man.... https://ift.tt/oOLuqSG #
Signed IFTTT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thecuriousloop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named 4 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Curious Loop” (@thecuriousloop), 192 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecuriousloop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.