Channel
@thecryptoplaybooks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
157subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002246277924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecryptoplaybooks |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecryptoplaybooks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 157 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 161 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 161 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (14 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀TWO MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENTS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1️⃣THE SYSTEM IS LIVE the TCP signal bot is now running 24/7 on a dedicated server. it scans gold, silver, NAS100 and US30 across multiple timeframes and fires signals directly into the VIP group automatically. every signal comes with: → entry price, stop loss, and TP1 → a grade (SE+, A+, A, B) based on confluence scoring → a confidence score out of 100 → automatic TP1 h…
❤1
The Crypto Playbook📚 pinned Deleted message
📊XAUUSD DAILY OUTLOOK — Wed 21 July Gold ripped +45 off 4,000 overnight and is now parked at PDH (~4,046) with 4H bank supply sitting at 4,065–4,080. Extended move on thin Asian volume — reaction zone, not a chase zone. Bias: SPLIT (4H bearish / 1H bullish). Two London scenarios: 🔴Sweep of 4,050 into 4,065–4,080 → rejection + M15 CHoCH down → 4,027 then 4,013 🟢Pullback into 4,027–4,031 or 4,019–4,022 FVG → hold + …
📍ZONE UPDATE — 4,025–4,030 invalidated Price ran through the zone and hit what would’ve been the SL at 4,034 — so anyone sitting on a limit order there took the loss. We didn’t take it. Our plan required 3 things before entry: retrace into the zone, rejection, and a confirmed CHoCH down. That confirmation never came, so no market entry was triggered — capital protected. This is the exact reason we don’t use blind l…
🎁 FREE DAILY TRADE — XAUUSD As promised, one free setup a day for the channel. Here’s today’s 👇 🔴SELL GOLD (New York session) Entry zone: 4,025–4,030 SL: 4,034 | TP1 4,000 · TP2 3,990 · TP3 3,978 ⌛Pending — don’t enter until: 1️⃣Price retraces UP into 4,025–4,030 2️⃣Rejection + lower-timeframe shift back down 3️⃣SL placed before entry. No retrace = no trade. This came from our full session analysis — HTF bearish,…
📊XAUUSD — SESSION ANALYSIS | Mon 20 July Gold sitting right on the 4,000 psychological after a heavy bearish week — HTF bias remains fully bearish, but the lows at 3,955-3,960 were swept and intraday structure has shifted bullish off them. Classic battleground. 🔑Key levels today: 🔴4,040-4,060 — golden pocket + H4 supply (the sell watch zone) 🔴4,022 — previous day high (liquidity resting above) ⚪️4,000 — the level e…
📣BIG ANNOUNCEMENT — TCP SMC PRO V4 IS LIVE Our own indicator. Built in-house from the ground up. The entire TCP system — on one chart. 🔠Graded A+ to C zones, scored /100 🔠BOS & CHoCH engine with fakeout protection 🔠Full liquidity map — sweeps, EQH/EQL, bank zones 🏦 🔠Auto TP projection + OTE golden pocket 🔠Live dashboard: TRADEABLE or STAND DOWN 🔠Alerts that watch the chart for you 🎁And it’s FREE — including the fu…
🎯FRIDAY FOLLOW-UP — THE ZONE PAID AFTER ALL ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Look at what happened after the breakeven close 👀 NY session opened, volume kicked in, and price ripped from our demand zone straight up to 4003 — through TP1, through TP2. Late sellers who shorted into the lows got wiped out aggressively, and their stops were the exact fuel for the move 📈 Full transparency as always: we were already out at breakeven — I …
⚪ SIGNAL UPDATE — BREAKEVEN CLOSE 🛡 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Final update on the Friday scalp: 🟢Zone filled at 3986–3984 — the dip swept the lows into demand exactly as mapped 📈Pushed to 3988, +20 to +40 pips on the table 🔻 Momentum faded before TP1 → price rotated back → out at breakeven, zero loss The zone did its job — the analysis was right, the follow-through wasn’t there. That’s trading. A breakeven on a valid setu…
Active
🟢XAUUSD - FRIDAY BUY SCALP 🎯 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Gold grinding higher in an ascending channel off this week’s lows. Price at 3997 = mid-channel, no edge. The opportunity is the dip 👇 THE SETUP: stops from this week’s longs are resting under 3984. A dip there sweeps that liquidity directly into the demand shelf (3986–3984) + channel support + moving average — triple confluence. That’s where buyers reload. 🟢BUY SCALP: 3…
📈 Retail Bitcoin buyers are becoming increasingly active. 💸 Wallets holding less than 1 BTC added nearly 11,000 BTC over the past month — their strongest accumulation since late 2023. ⚖️ That's roughly the same balance increase recorded by wallets holding 1,000–10,000 BTC. 🐻 Historically, retail buying is accelerating during the later stages of bear markets.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @thecryptoplaybooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Crypto Playbook📚” (@thecryptoplaybooks), 157 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptoplaybooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.