Channel
@thecryptokeepa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,082subscribers
-116 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002185223893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecryptokeepa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecryptokeepa |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 1,082 | -19 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 1,101 | -25 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 1,126 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 1,134 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 1,138 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 1,150 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 1,162 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 1,175 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 1,179 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 1,187 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 1,198 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 1,198 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 7 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SWIFT is doing everything they can at this point to stay relevant. We are witnessing the “join in” phase…. Once the last hold ups realize that SWIFT, just isn’t needed, and can’t compete with new technology, it’ll fall just as TELEX did…
❤1
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/4QHCVuImtdQWzgePB
👎1🥰1
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/xqeUF3PCPCHQsAYsa
👎1
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/gWwnunCcwYuLuOATu
Signed Nicholas A
Another token that I am extremely bullish on, is Chainlink. Partnering with over 11,500 banks, and many institutions, Chainlinks unique Oracle network and function is positioning the token to achieve great heights. XRP and Chainlink are not in direct competition. They are working together, and they both serve completely different functions. With that being said, it’s definitely one to watch!
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/TkyAw3I77bmuDSWDs
Signed Nicholas A
A sharp eyed analyst put together a collection of evidence that he believes proves BlackRock and Ripple may be one and the same entity or closely working hand in hand. Coinbase has recently dropped a huge percentage of their XRP holdings, and many claim they may have been transferred to institutions such as BlackRock. Either way, this latest announcement that BlackRock will join the 2025 Ripple Swell conference lends…
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/DAqUIqmww6nQKJdHD
❤1
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/tiUyU26Zs17kCOfCd
Signed Nicholas A
We should be living our full 120 year life cycle, and with the advances in technology, our life expectancy should be increasing, but that’s not the case. We are sicker, and more unhealthy than ever before, and our life expectancy is dropping…..
Signed Nicholas A
If you can’t beat them, join them…..
Signed Nicholas A
https://share.google/8B33dmrjf6BpkAbO9
Signed Nicholas A
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thecryptokeepa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Crypt-o Keeper/XRP🔥” (@thecryptokeepa), 1,082 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptokeepa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.