🚨 $BTC WEEKLY UPDATE 🚨 We’re at a very important decision point The first bullish confirmation I’m watching is a weekly close above $65,750 A clean reclaim and hold above this level would strengthen the case that the recent breakdown was a shakeout rather than the start of a deeper trend From there, I’ll be watching $75,000 first, followed by $82,500 RSI is also showing signs of recovery while holding its rising…

Channel
The Crypto Beast
@thecryptobeast01
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
257subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001723366098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecryptobeast01 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecryptobeast01 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 257 | -1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 08:18 | 258 | -3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 261 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 264 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 265 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 252 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 252 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 U.S. Senate postpones Clarity Act vote to September for when they return from August recess
👍1
BIG WEEK 😉
🔥1
NEXT LEG HIGHER SOON
🤔2
➡️ NOT TOO MUCH TO UPDATE ➡️ SHORT-TERM SHAKEOUTS MAY OCCUR, BUT AS LONG AS $60K HOLDS OVERALL, THIS LOOKS VERY BULLISH FOR THE COMING WEEKS
👍4
$TROLL BREAKOUT UPDATE The descending resistance that capped price for weeks is finally breakingggg This is exactly where sentiment flips, Everyone wanted $TROLL at higher prices, Almost nobody wanted it during consolidation Now the compression is ending, The real move usually starts after the breakout — not before it
🚨 THE NEXT TWO WEEKS ARE CRITICAL FOR THE CRYPTO MARKET STRUCTURE BILL 🚨 ➡️ With the Senate in recess until July 13, Senate staff and key industry leaders are working to resolve the bill’s remaining issues ➡️ The bill needs 60 votes to pass and is expected to hit the Senate floor in late July or early August ➡️ If the Clarity Act doesn’t pass the Senate before the August recess, its chances of becoming law this ye…
✅ $TROLL LOOKS LOADED HERE ➡️ The setup is getting interesting, the conviction remains strong and the next major move could come when the market least expects it
$ZANO 😉😉
✅ Reached ➡️ Let's see if this zone can hold
➡️ My thesis remains simple ✅ One final flush into the $61,000 – $62,000 zone to wipe out overleveraged longs ✅ Then BOOM - Maximum fear - Maximum liquidations - Maximum opportunity ✅ The market loves to punish the majority before rewarding the patient
➡️ At some point within the next 1–4 weeks, I believe $BTC could print a massive impulsive candle and catch the majority of the market completely off guard ➡️ Not because everyone is bullish But because almost nobody is - Sentiment is still fragile - Confidence is low - Most people are waiting for more Dips or confirmations ➡️ That's exactly why the market loves to move when the fewest people are positioned ➡️ Th…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thecryptobeast01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Crypto Beast” (@thecryptobeast01), 257 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptobeast01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.