когда подшарил за модное я и кто #мемы || @thecatonthemoonfield
custom 542696262901907104934🍓7👻4🕊3custom 54247945638877921472custom 52445388366288239961custom 54270959362140067291

Channel
@thecatonthemoonfield
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
667subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002127915865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecatonthemoonfield |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecatonthemoonfield |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 667 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 667 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
382 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424592739079585074 | 110 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5426962629019071049 | 82 | 21.5% | |
| 🍓 | 55 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5424794563887792147 | 47 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5244538836628823996 | 26 | 6.81% | |
| 💊 | 21 | 5.50% | |
| custom 5427095936214006729 | 20 | 5.24% | |
| 🕊 | 15 | 3.93% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.524% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thecatonthemoonfield. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 February 2026 to 12 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
когда подшарил за модное я и кто #мемы || @thecatonthemoonfield
custom 542696262901907104934🍓7👻4🕊3custom 54247945638877921472custom 52445388366288239961custom 54270959362140067291
по субботам мемы полная ф*гня 😎 тв матюки #эдиты || @thecatonthemoonfield
💊20custom 52445388366288239969custom 54245927390795850746🍓3custom 54247945638877921473custom 54269626290190710491
Доброго всем вам дня! 🤍 В последнее время я совсем обленилась и стала редко что-то постить. Дело в том, что я всё-таки решила сменить фандом и завела новый канал по Человеку-бензопиле. Кому интересно - милости прошу, буду очень рада вашей поддержке. Этот канал пока уходит на рест, но иногда я, наверное, всё же буду забегать сюда с каким-то контентом. Простите, что так вышло, и спасибо за понимание🪼 #оффтоп || @the…
custom 54245927390795850747custom 54247945638877921477custom 52445388366288239964
🪦🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🪦 🪦🤩🪦🪦🤩🪦🪦🤩🪦🪦🤩🪦 Любите аниме и мангу "Человек-бензопила" и хотели бы видеть больше контента по ней? 🌟 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 Тогда приглашаю вас в свой канал! 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Приветствую вас. Меня зовут Риша [🤍], на ты 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🍵В этом канале будут мои эдиты, мемы и всякие смешнявки, небольшие зарисовки и хедканоны по этой вселенной. Буду рада видеть вас здесь! #инфопост || @chainsawcsm правила 🖤 н
custom 54270959362140067297🕊3custom 54245927390795850743
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Первым на расстрел у нас был... Гробовщик, с которым никто не ошибся! Далее шла наша любимая, дорогая Мадам Ред, и тут тоже многие оказались правы Уильям был предпоследним. Я долго размышляла над тем, стоит ли оставить слова о бюрократии, но все-таки сохранила их, и... большинство из вас снова угадали! И завершающий пост пришёлся на Отелло. Даже несмотря на то, что он был гораздо сложнее, чем предыдущие три…
custom 542459273907958507420🍓7custom 54269626290190710495
и последнее послание, завершающее сегодняшний интерактив! его я постаралась сделать максимально сложным и заковыристым, но, думаю, вы угадаете) пишите свои варианты в комментарии и, может быть, именно вы станете тем, кто угадает всех героев и получит от меня небольшой приз! #интерактивы || @thecatonthemoonfield в 20.00 по мск итоги!!
custom 542459273907958507410🍓3🕊3custom 54247945638877921471custom 54270959362140067291
а это грустное послание от кого? варианты в комментарии 🥹 #интерактивы || @thecatonthemoonfield
🍓14custom 54269626290190710495custom 54270959362140067294
давайте так: в конце дня я составлю список мест отвечавших (кто больше всех даст правильных ответов), а победителю (первому человеку, угадавшему всех) я подарю 25 звёздочек! важное примечание: будут засчитываться ответы, отправленные только сегодня #оффтоп || @thecatonthemoonfield
custom 542459273907958507414🍓3
𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐧𝐢 𝐲𝐮𝐤𝐮 𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐧𝐨 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐒𝐚𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐧𝐨 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐲 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞👻 🦴🤩🤩🤩🤩🦴🤩🤩🤩🤩🦴 Кто же автор этого послания..? Ваши версии - в комментарии🖤 #интерактивы || @thecatonthemoonfield
custom 542696262901907104914🕊6custom 54245927390795850745custom 52445388366288239963🍓2💊1
🪽🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🪽 🪽🪽🪽 🫴🫴🫴Мы с Mademoiselle Chamber и Мамой Снейка представляем вам небольшую интерактивную игру! 🐇 Вам будут представлены несколько поздравительных открыток, написанных персонажами Тёмного дворецкого. Ваша задача - угадать, кто отправитель. Пишите свои варианты в комментариях! Думаю, здесь легко догадаться #интерактивы || @thecatonthemoonfield p.s. в…
custom 542459273907958507415custom 542696262901907104912custom 52445388366288239966🍓2
у Дюди сегодня день рождения, поздравляем 🖤 желаю всего самого наилучшего, побольше нервных клеток и многааа Снейков 🖤 || @thecatonthemoonfield
custom 542459273907958507427custom 54247945638877921477🍓2custom 54269626290190710492
А ᥴᥱᴦ᧐дня ужᥱ ᥰρ᧐ɯ᧘᧐ ρ᧐ʙн᧐ дʙᥲ ᴦ᧐дᥲ ᥴ ʍ᧐ʍᥱнᴛᥲ ᥴ᧐ɜдᥲнᥙя ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ κᥲнᥲ᧘ᥲ, ᥙ я ρᥱɯᥙ᧘ᥲ нᥲᥰ᧐ʍнᥙᴛь, чᥱʍ я ᴛуᴛ ʙ᧐᧐δщᥱ ɜᥲнᥙʍᥲюᥴь Иᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ у ʍᥱня нᥙ ʍн᧐ᴦ᧐ нᥙ ʍᥲ᧘᧐ ᥴɸ᧐ρʍᥙρ᧐ʙᥲ᧘᧐ᥴь нᥱᥴκ᧐᧘ьκ᧐ ᥲᥴᥰᥱκᴛ᧐ʙ дᥱяᴛᥱ᧘ьн᧐ᥴᴛᥙ: 🔽🥹 ɸᥲнɸᥙκᥙ ᥙ ᥰᥙᥴᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьᥴᴛʙ᧐ 🥹 хᥱдκᥲн᧐ны ᥰ᧐ ᴛёʍн᧐ʍу дʙ᧐ρᥱцκ᧐ʍу 🥹 ϶дᥙᴛы ᥰ᧐ ᴛд (ᥙ нᥱ ᴛ᧐᧘ьκ᧐) 🥹 κучᥲᥲᥲ ʍᥱʍ᧐ʙ 🥹 ᥙ ρᥲɜδ᧐ρы ᥰᥱᥴᥱн (ʙʍᥱᥴᴛᥱ ᥴ᧐ ᥴρᥲʙнᥱнᥙᥱʍ ᥴ ᥰᥱρᥴ᧐нᥲжᥲʍᥙ дʙ᧐ρᥱцκ᧐ᴦ᧐) 🥹ρᴛ/ρᥱᥲκцᥙᥙ ᥲκᴛᥙʙн᧐ ᥰρᥙʙᥱᴛᥴᴛʙуюᴛᥴя! а ещё я веду тгк…
custom 542479456388779214723custom 54269626290190710499custom 54270959362140067297custom 52445388366288239963custom 54245927390795850743
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @thecatonthemoonfield. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,324,832 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@thecatonthemoonfield named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кот на лунном поле” (@thecatonthemoonfield), 667 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecatonthemoonfield.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.