Channel
@thebrillantway1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
170subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651716804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thebrillantway1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thebrillantway1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 170 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:30 | 170 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 September 2025 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 127 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 21:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
33 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 57.6% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 21.2% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2025 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Проведу консультацию: Для тех экспертов, фрилансеров и мастеров, ☘️ кто годами учится, но всё ещё боится поднять чек и называть стоимость услуг ровным голосом ☘️ кто живет на «финансовых качелях» (то густо, то пусто) и боится остаться без клиентов ☘️ кто чувствует выгорание, спасает всех вокруг 24/7 и отдает все силы, но не видит реальных денег ☘️ кто боится увеличить чек или назвать цену ☘️ кто чувствует что пора п…
Приветствую новых подписчиков! Давайте знакомиться😊 Я Ольга Боровкова, дипломированный психолог (магистр психологии) и энергопрактик. Помогаю экспертам, фрилансерам и помогающим специалистам выстраивать устойчивую частную практику без выгорания, стыда и постоянных финансовых качелей. Моя главная тема - это прокачка психологических навыков для роскошной жизни на фрилансе и финансовой емкости. Отношения с Собой и с…
Channel name was changed to «Деньги рядом❤️»
🖤 А деньги у вас вообще «водятся»? 💸😏 Иногда человек говорит: «Я хочу больше зарабатывать!» 💰 И вроде бы желание есть. Цели есть. Даже работать готов. Но если посмотреть внимательнее… 🤔 — деньги приходят 💸 — и почему-то быстро уходят; — клиенты появляются 🙋♀️ — а потом снова тишина; — хочется поднять цену 📈 — но страшно: «А вдруг уйдут?»; — хочется проявляться 🔥 — но в голове: «Что люди подумают?»; — хочется мн…
❤3👏1🔥1
Друзья, я снова в практике 🕊 Долго была в магистратуре, набиралась новых глубин. Сейчас возвращаюсь к работе. Помогаю с тревогой, выгоранием, обесцениванием, границами. Формат — онлайн. Если у вас или у знакомых есть запрос — буду рада откликнуться. Подробности о формате и цене — в закреплённом посте в моём VK (Я ВКонтакте: vk.com/borovkowa_olga)
🔥3❤1👍1👏1
😂👍👍❤️👌😅😊😊😍😘 В субботу 29.11 в 13:30 по мск Если делаешь участвовать, поставь + я расскажу как попасть на эфир
Что будет от меня на эфире?👇 Буду сканировать поле, как будто мы уже в 31 декабря 2026 года. (До эфира: для желающих участвовать, в сканировании поля, нужно ваша цель, желание на год) - Какие уроки необходимо усвоить для получения желаемого результата? - Какие трансформации необходимо сделать уже сейчас, чтобы осуществить задуманное? Будет общая информация и небольшой разбор 1-2 человек по 5 минут ответ на 1 ваш…
❤1
Алена Дергачева — SMM-наставник с опытом продвижения клиентов в течение 10 лет, профессиональный журналист, эксперт по онлайн-рекламе. Среди клиентов — известный тренер по отношениям, риелторы, дизайнеры, врачи, салоны красоты, стартапы и другие компании, бренды и специалисты. Результаты: - 100 000 качественных подписчиков тренеру по отношениям и выстроенная система продаж с соцсетей практически с нуля - https://t…
❤1
Коротко, о том, с кем я буду вести эфир👇
Знаете, я заметила: декабрь — это месяц, когда люди особенно готовы менять свою жизнь. Закрывать старое. Запускать новое. Вкладываться в себя. И это идеальное время, чтобы собрать свою базу клиентов — ту, которая будет с тобой весь следующий год. 📩 Мне на днях написала маркетолог, с которой мы давно хотели сделать что-то вместе. И она говорит: “Покажем, как в декабре создать поток клиентов, даже если сейчас тишина?…
❤1👍1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Сегодня прошёл наш эфир на тему «Женщина и деньги: как принять свою ценность и позволить себе больше» 🌸 Было волшебно — спасибо всем, кто был в прямом! А кто не успел, не переживайте 💫 🎥 Завтра выложу запись в группе прямых эфиров — сможете посмотреть в удобное время.
❤5🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @thebrillantway1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Представьте, что вы сталкиваетесь с трудной задачей, важной для вас целью. Что вы обычно делаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2025 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Деньги рядом❤️” (@thebrillantway1), 170 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thebrillantway1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.