Channel
@theblindtexts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
411subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001210549358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theblindtexts |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theblindtexts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 411 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 409 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 409 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 408 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,055 |
| Reactions total | 231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
231 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 147 | 63.6% | |
| 💔 | 25 | 10.8% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 9.96% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 8.66% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 3.46% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.60% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.433% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یکی از دشواریهای خواندن شعر کلاسیک این است که ما گاهی فراموش میکنیم شاعر، شاعر است؛ نه گزارشنویس، نه صورتجلسهنویس و نه مأمور ثبت جزئیات واقعیت. شاعر در جهان تشبیهها زندگی میکند و تشبیه، همیشه به معنای یکسان بودن دو چیز در تمام ویژگیها نیست. حافظ وقتی میگوید: «من این مُرَقَّعِ رنگین چو گُل بخواهم سوخت» منظورش این نیست که گل را هم میسوزانند و او میخواهد لباسش را همانگونه بسوزاند که گل را میسوزانند. وجه شبا…
❤4👍4
استاد شفیعی کدکنی در یک رباعی میسراید: بیا ای دوست اینجا در وطن باش! شریکِ رنج و شادیهای من باش! زنان اینجا چو شیرِ شرزه کوشند اگر مردی، در اینجا باش و زن باش. امروز چهاردهم مرداد است، به همین مناسبت، برمیگردیم به یک سال پیش و یادی میکنیم از قمرالملوک وزیری. 🎙🎵🎻 @theblindtexts
❤9
امروز که سیزدهم مرداد است و در نوشته قبلی هم از زبان، کمی نوشتم، خالی از لطف نیست کتابی را که با بیان تاریخ امروز، آغاز میشود و همچنین زبان نقش پررنگی در شکلگیری شخصیتهای این اثر بر عهده دارد، معرفی کنم. اگر این اثر را خواندهاید تجدید خاطره میشود و اگر هم نخواندهاید امیدوارم این مطلب، انگیزهای برای مطالعهاش باشد. کمتر رمانی در ادبیات معاصر فارسی را میتوان یافت که به اندازهٔ داییجان ناپلئون نشان دهد زبان، ف…
❤4👏4
در ایران فقط با زبانهای مختلف روبهرو نیستی؛ با جهانهای مختلف روبهرو میشوی. هر شهر، هر روستا و گاهی حتی هر محله، موسیقی خاص خودش را در کلمات پنهان کرده است. آدمها ممکن است یک زبان مشترک داشته باشند، اما همان زبان را با صدها رنگ و آهنگ متفاوت بر زبان بیاورند؛ آنقدر متفاوت که گاهی از روی کشیدن یک مصوت یا مکثی کوتاه میان دو واژه، میتوان فهمید کسی از کدام کوچه، کدام محله و کدام گوشهٔ این سرزمین آمده است؛ اما یاد…
❤9😢4
و این یکی هم عمل تناقضآمیز دیگری است که چند سال پیش حواسم بهش بوده و در موردش نوشتم. @theblindtexts
❤1
در این پست که ریپلای میکنم یکی از موارد نقض غرض بیان شده است. @theblindtexts
❤1
بعضی تناقضها آنقدر آشکارند که آدم نمیداند باید به آنها بخندد یا در مواجهه با آنها اندوهگین شود. گاهی انسان، چنان درگیر وسیله میشود که هدف را از یاد میبرد؛ آنقدر که سرانجام، برای رسیدن به مقصد، درست در جهت مخالف آن قدم برمیدارد. قدیمیها برای این وضعیت تعبیر زیبایی داشتند: «نقضِ غرض»؛ یعنی کاری کنی که نتیجهاش، دقیقاً خلاف همان چیزی باشد که از ابتدا برایش دست به کار شدهای. این روزها هر بار که به ماجرای مذاکره …
❤6👍3👏1
من یک پیراهن سبز دارم؛ احتمالاً سبز دریاییِ تیره. البته از آنجا که سبز هزاران طیف دارد و من هم هیچوقت رنگها را به وضوح ندیدهام، این «احتمالاً» را همیشه کنار اسمش میگذارم. گاهی وقتها که با خودم فکر میکنم دیگر از من گذشته است و حالا، اگر نگوییم پیر شدهام، دستکم دارم آرامآرام به میانسالی قدم میگذارم، همین پیراهن را میپوشم. تقریباً محال است کسی مرا با آن ببیند و بیتفاوت از کنارم بگذرد. یکی میپرسد: «از کجا خر…
❤13👍5🥰2😍1
در میان این همه شعار، خبر، تحلیل و موضعگیری، بد نیست یک بار هم از خودمان بپرسیم که سهم واقعی ما از همدردی با رنج دیگران چیست؟ سالهاست نام فلسطین، لبنان و بسیاری از سرزمینهای درگیر جنگ و بحران را میشنویم. تصاویر ویرانی را میبینیم، از کشتهشدن انسانهای بیگناه اندوهگین میشویم و آرزو میکنیم روزی خشونت از زندگی مردم آن سرزمینها رخت بربندد. اما در کنار همه این احساسات، پرسشی آرام و سمج در ذهنم شکل میگیرد: ما واق…
❤4👏3👍2🤣1
هر وقت سخن از شهری به میان میآید، خیلی زود کسانی پیدا میشوند که با قاطعیت میگویند: «مردم فلان شهر چنیناند» یا «اهالی بهمان شهر چناناند.» انگار بتوان چند میلیون انسان را در یک جمله خلاصه کرد؛ گویی شهری، شخصیتی واحد دارد و همهٔ ساکنانش نسخههایی از یکدیگرند. اما تجربهٔ زیسته، با این قطعیتها میانهای ندارد. هر انسانی، شهرها را از پنجرهٔ زندگی خودش میبیند. ممکن است دو نفر، در یک روز، در یک خیابان و حتی کنار هم قدم…
❤11👏2
نسبت به مطلبی که ریپلای میکنم، در مورد شیرازیها بعد از ۱۴ سال مطمئنتر شدم که درست است اما در مورد اصفهانیها قسمتی از آن را درست میدانم و قسمت دیگر را هم باید کسانی که بیشتر با آنان دمخور بودهاند تصدیق یا تکذیب کنند. @theblindtexts
❤3
حالا که بحث سفر به اصفهان در میان است، برگردیم و خاطره اولین سفرم به این شهر را بخوانیم. @theblindtexts
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @theblindtexts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 147,623 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌫 زندگی مه آلود🌫” (@theblindtexts), 411 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theblindtexts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.