Channel
@thealienton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002234661308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @europenode @thealienton |
| Description | Sharing information about the Telegram ecosystem, NFT Gifts and TON Contact - @clipscreator |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thealienton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 21 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 21 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 February 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 111 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
114 reactions across 17 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447480155943492724 | 21 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5402444829684690585 | 20 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5305408637861133036 | 14 | 12.3% | |
| custom 4990325649433429541 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5406926593698312391 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5258378333653056711 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5447458260200214425 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| custom 4965219701572503640 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5220085642192500606 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5343749248271790122 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5359746893347823428 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5379571152421136232 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5431800965512571164 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5994323406479167187 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5312129763463147028 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5352967832931966913 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5357503073583374972 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5382240706523832547 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5417925575446667362 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5451945826714678936 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 5 further kinds | 8 | 7.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thealienton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎂 Happy Birthday, Telegram Thank you to the @telegram team and @durov for the best app in the world. For me, Telegram is already much more than just a messenger, and I hope to make even more great memories with this app in the future
custom 51930184018108229511custom 52583783336530567111custom 54070648100408648831
👋 Mr Cactus Holdings The community will help see all channels at once: my personal channel, both channels with usernames, and the channel from my mini-app. In the future, I will probably add something else of my own to the community, but for now, only the main channels are there. I also want to say that I have launched an advertising market inside the Rich Message mini-app; now everyone can advertise something as t…
custom 53529678329319669132custom 54179255754466673622custom 58754656282859312332
Posted without readable text
🇪🇸
custom 59943234064791671873custom 53121297634631470282custom 53822407065238325472
➕ Happy Birthday My 19th birthday has come to an end. Ahead lies a year with its own plans, goals, and dreams. Perhaps it will be difficult and not easy at times, but I believe that is part of the journey. It is the part that gives experience and knowledge, which later help to move forward and make new decisions. Over the past year, one of the main thoughts, once again proven, became the idea that a person is only …
custom 54474801559434927246custom 54069265936983123915custom 52583783336530567113
https://telegram.org/blog/communities-editor-invisible-messages
custom 53054086378611330361custom 54024448296846905851custom 54474801559434927241
🧼 June It turned out to be a rather interesting month; I managed to try and do a lot of new things over these 30 days. The month started with the launch of my personal website; I still admire the design that ChatGPT was able to recreate every time. In terms of costs, this whole pleasure with the personal website cost 40 dollars (ChatGPT Pro subscription, personal website domain, and Gemini Plus subscription). Next…
custom 54024448296846905853custom 54474801559434927242custom 53054086378611330361
https://telegram.org/blog/watch-apps-and-more
custom 54024448296846905852custom 53054086378611330361custom 54474801559434927241
Have a nice summer 😀
custom 54024448296846905854custom 53054086378611330361custom 54474801559434927241
🧩 The post I wanted to make On February 1, 2022, I bought shares of Nvidia for the second time, and that purchase became the cheapest of all transactions for this stock, with a purchase price of $220.2. Today, four years later, the price of one Nvidia share has once again reached the mark of $220. Over these four years, my shares have made a full circle - from the purchase price, they went up to the split* 10 to 1 a…
custom 53054086378611330363custom 54024448296846905853custom 54474801559434927242
👋 Gift panic As expected, the rise of TON immediately hit the prices of gifts due to the panic in which people want to take all the growing TON from gifts. It's possible that I'm wrong in what I'll say, but this is just my opinion, which is below in three paragraphs. • Firstly Acting under the panic caused by MTONGA, the next four steps of which are not even known yet, seems to me an unwise decision. Even if it's v…
custom 54024448296846905853custom 53054086378611330361custom 54474801559434927241
🤣 Base.app updated their app a few minutes ago, removing the regular feed, which made my app pointless, but it is still very significant to me as it provided valuable knowledge for future apps, so I don't care about their update. Moreover, there are plans for a personal mini-app in Telegram. Good luck
custom 53054086378611330362custom 54024448296846905852custom 54474801559434927241
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thealienton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 348,967 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Alien 👽” (@thealienton), 21 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thealienton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.