Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГРУППА ЮГ 🏴‍☠️

Channel

ГРУППА ЮГ 🏴‍☠️

@the_south_group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

359subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002184591314
TypeChannel
Username@the_south_group
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/the_south_group

Growth

352359355.56 August 2026 — 352 subscribers6 August 2026 — 352 subscribers13 August 2026 — 359 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 351–360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:15359+7
6 Aug 2026, 21:17352no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:31352first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 359 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.8
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,421
Reactions total231
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54652630943704255474619.9%
custom 53685892517577572594017.3%
🔥3916.9%
custom 52763505169289890542812.1%
custom 5242579030166749370229.52%
custom 5465665597230571020166.93%
custom 5462993736730441098114.76%
custom 5465540085401269108104.33%
👍93.90%
custom 536640908340863516152.16%
custom 546524888661860998441.73%
custom 546536969116374484610.433%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC36 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kubankaSpNPhoto

Оперативники ЦСН «Кубанька» проводят выходные с пользой 🏴‍☠️ @kubankaSpN

🔥4👍2custom 52763505169289890542custom 54656655972305710202

6 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC48 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

👍

custom 54652630943704255475custom 52763505169289890543custom 53685892517577572593

6 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC52 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

THEY DONT CARE 🏴‍☠️

🔥5custom 53685892517577572594👍2custom 52763505169289890541

6 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥2custom 54655400854012691082👍1custom 53685892517577572591

6 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC63 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Когда попал 1 раз из 5 в гонг 🔥 p.s. чисто я

custom 52425790301667493706custom 54652630943704255473🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC60 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RSOTMLIFEPhoto

Уважаемое шановне панство(хохлы) к сожплению, у меня на карте нет денег как у Долиной я не смогу вам перевести. Со мной такие темы не прокатывают. 😎

custom 54652630943704255479🔥5custom 53685892517577572594

6 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC66 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Доброе бандиты Улыбаемся и пашем 🏴‍☠️💪🏼

🔥8custom 54655400854012691084custom 53685892517577572592custom 54652630943704255471

5 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC76 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Реально

custom 54652630943704255475custom 53685892517577572593custom 54656655972305710203🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 54655400854012691084

5 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC79 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Малый флекс в зале 🔥

custom 53685892517577572595🔥4custom 52763505169289890544

5 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC87 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

На этом видео хорошо показано, что такое мышечная память. Несмотря на команду переключиться на «вторичку», руки автоматически начинают выполнять привычный алгоритм после пустого магазина — свершить то, что предписывают древние Боги войны: вставить новый магазин. Именно поэтому в тренировочный процесс важно регулярно добавлять новые вводные. Это заставляет мозг не просто воспроизводить заученные действия, а принима

👍4custom 52763505169289890543custom 53685892517577572593🔥1custom 54629937367304410981custom 54653696911637448461custom 54656655972305710201

5 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC85 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для важных переговоров

custom 54652630943704255477custom 54656655972305710205custom 52425790301667493703custom 54629937367304410981

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @the_south_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 226,045 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГРУППА ЮГ 🏴‍☠️” (@the_south_group), 359 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_south_group.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.