Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 52 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 20:57
7
-1
8 Sept 2026, 20:58
8
-1
12 Aug 2026, 12:17
9
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:22
9
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5287250972127544725
8
25.8%
custom 5404476357805613107
8
25.8%
custom 5287264741792696328
6
19.4%
❤
5
16.1%
⚡
1
3.23%
👀
1
3.23%
🔥
1
3.23%
🦄
1
3.23%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Столкнулась с тем, что даже накидывая достаточно четко, как я вижу логику, работу положения, нейронка принимает зачастую очень странные решения и по дизайну и по пути пользователя, техническим моментам. Так что буду пробовать всё же найти время и глубоко нарисовать (схематично) визуал и продумать логику, как, что и за чем должно следовать.
Не так всё просто оказалось, как хотелось бы 😅
Понемногу тестирую приложение для запоминания слов, которое давно хотела написать.. Именно с такой технологией гибкой работы с пользователем и развития навыка запоминания я ещё не видела нигде решений, интересно будет посмотреть, как будет работать на практике
Сейчас работаю над скиллами для агентов по генерации видео 📹. Хочется интересную картинку со множеством анимаций, чтобы сразу эффект "Вау, красиво!", и ни одной мылси об ИИ...
Больше всего намучилась с анимацией интерфейсов, которые крутятся цилиндрически, через что мы только с нейронкой не прошли... (см скрины)
Пока в процессе поиска подходов, но основные выводы следующие:
- насмотренность критически необходима, я …
Привет! Алёна. 🪶
Я набираюсь опыта в роли технического специалиста для дизайнеров и экспертов в инфобизнесе.
Здесь собираюсь делиться в основном личным, но и так же опытом погружения в разработку, чему учусь в процессе работы, с чем сталкиваюсь, что реализую.
Мой путь начался в науке: 6 лабораторий, бакалавриат по физике и химии, магистратура по бизнесу, IT. Обе дипломные работы были связаны с теоретической физикой…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @the_schrodinger_graph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Граф Шрёдингера” (@the_schrodinger_graph), 7 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_schrodinger_graph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
