Channel
@the_letter_of_life
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
309subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001775475436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_letter_of_life |
| Created | 4 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_letter_of_life |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 309 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 312 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 311 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 310 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 310 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
150 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 38.7% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 28.0% | |
| 👻 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 4.67% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 4.00% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.33% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.667% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @the_letter_of_life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Щас должен влететь кто-то, кто начнёт задвигать, что Эксмо – лучшее издательство. Как хорошо, что бан-лист для идиотов – резиновый 😂😂 Пусть идут читают идеальные ИИ-тексты, этому я, к сожалению, никак не смогу помешать. Только очистить своё пространство
❤1
Оказывается, на авторской конференции Эксмо кто-то из тамощних ляпнул, что у ИИ идеально гладкое повествование. Кто-то ещё считает, что они не конченные? 😂😂😂
😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
👻12❤1
Лять, ну уже одно вот это говорит о том, что надо как-то собраться с духом и вернуться в АХС
❤4🔥1
– Ну, ладно, допустим, обойдёмся без голограмм и неона. – Продолжила она. – Но почему всё такое буквальное? А как же неожиданные цвета? Игра с пропорциями? Символизм? Я думала, колшарская интеллигенция ценит более абстрактное искусство, открывающее полёт мысли. – А что мешает твоей мысли лететь, когда ты смотришь на эти картины? – Кхеф тут же осадил себя, подумав, что это могло прозвучать слишком грубо. – Да, поклон…
😁8❤1
#ПламяКолшара движется. Кхеф привёл Морин в картинную галерею. А там… не то, что на картинке, а красивые инопланетные пейзажи почти в традиционной технике )) Ниже кусочек 👇🏼👇🏼
❤6
Ебически! 😍😍
😁1
Какова красота 😍 #анонсы
❤6🥰2
Так, скучный ромфант дочитан. Теперь хочу надкусить вот это ) Очень люблю оригинальную трилогию, а вот предыстория президента не зашла. Возможно, потому что сам президент та ещё гадость с самого начала. А Хэймитча я всегда любила, так что возлагаю надежды )
❤4🍓3
Поняла для себя, что скука (допустим, в книгах) бывает двух видов: пассивная и активная (а то и вовсе агрессивная). Пассивная скука – это когда ты читаешь/слушаешь книгу, и вроде ничего не триггерит тебя, не отталкивает, просто не очень интересно, что будет дальше, и непонятно, зачем ты в целом читаешь то, что читаешь. Негатива нет, но нет и особого стимула. Такие книги я чаще всего дочитываю (особенно если они корот…
😁10❤2
А ещё сегодня «выкинула в окно» одну призовую книгу крупной российской фантастической премии. И дело даже не в том, что авторское фантдопущение тотально нежизнеспособное – это хрен с ним. Просто сама книга неимоверно скучно написана, просто невывозимо скучно. Многое становится понятным, когда видишь, что до этой книги автор писал только нонфик. К нему вопросы снимаются. Не снимаются к тем, кто решил, что эта книга –…
❤10👻2😁1
Дочитала!)) Книгой лета не станет (самым любимым рассказом так и остался второй), но всё равно это было очень хорошо )) Рекомендую!)
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @the_letter_of_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мастер фантастических нитей | А.Некрасова ✨” (@the_letter_of_life), 309 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_letter_of_life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.