Channel
@the_cyberlab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004393487108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_cyberlab |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 26 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_cyberlab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 41 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 39 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 37 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 36 | +13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 23 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 20 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 20 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 18 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 11 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.79% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 8 | 8.79% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| custom 5395834771936945370 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| custom 5447480155943492724 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5454357876053138877 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5188353990017960512 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5222185309969619509 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5343636681473935403 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5370842086658546991 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5469931384518755322 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5395499820322430983 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5440537087906434767 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5442842815329487849 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 14 further kinds | 16 | 17.6% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Cyber Lab 💻 〰️ Practical Cybersecurity | Ethical Hacking | Penetration Testing 🗡️ 🚁📂 CTF • Linux • Networking • Malware Analysis 🔄 📚 Learn Practice. Secure. 🔍 Contact: @SHX_RedTeam 👑
custom 53436366814739354033❤🔥1🎉1🔥1😍1custom 53012757196811907381custom 54540797855106602831custom 54543578760531388771
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔4🌚1🏆1custom 51883539900179605121custom 53708420866585469911custom 54405370879064347671custom 58187753069740068431
The Cyber Lab 💻 🔐 Practical Cybersecurity | Ethical Hacking | Penetration Testing 🗡️ 🚁📂 CTF • Linux • Networking • Malware Analysis 🔄 📚 Learn Practice. Secure. 🔍 Contact: @SHX_RedTeam 👑
🤔2🌚1custom 52221853099696195091custom 53255428475443347841
Иштиёқ билан хоҳлаган нарсамга эришаман. Агар ҳаракат қилмаётган бўлсам, у нарса қийматини йўқотган.
custom 54474801559434927244custom 54699313845187553222❤🔥1🌚1😍1🆒1custom 53481756802217581531custom 53954998203224309831
🍿 Qaysi honada dam olgan boʻlardingiz 🔴 🏠
😍4🌚2🤷♂1😴1custom 51883539900179605121custom 54430973737461565451
Posted without readable text
🔥1😍1custom 51883539900179605121custom 53958347719369453701custom 54406720959084157531custom 54543578760531388771custom 54699313845187553221
🐉
🎉1🔥1custom 53958347719369453701
cmd mstsc
👀3🔥1custom 53956052317047753931custom 53958347719369453701
CMD secpol.msc windows security 💻
👏2🏆1👀1🔥1custom 52221853099696195091custom 53954998203224309831
Here’s a safe, awareness-focused, SEO-friendly caption you can use for a post about dark web markets without promoting illegal activity: --- Dark Web Markets — The Hidden Economy of the Internet 🌐⚠️ Beneath the surface web exists an underground ecosystem where anonymous marketplaces have operated for years. These dark web markets are often associated with: • Stolen data • Leaked credentials • Fraud activity • Mal…
🤔2custom 53708420866585469912👀1👌1🔥1custom 53416449591098950601
Top 5 Dark Web Websites Cybersecurity Researchers Should Know The dark web isn’t just a place for crime — it’s also where security researchers, journalists, and investigators monitor leaks, threats, and underground activity. Understanding how the dark web works helps professionals track data breaches, threat actors, leaked credentials, and cybercrime trends. In this post, we explore some well-known dark web platfo…
🎉2👌1💯1🆒1custom 52221853099696195091custom 53958347719369453701custom 54405370879064347671custom 54428428153294878491
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @the_cyberlab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Cyber Lab” (@the_cyberlab), 41 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_cyberlab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.