Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Steve‘s routine

@the_SHarrington

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002967307901
TypeChannel
Username@the_SHarrington
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/the_SHarrington

Growth

373837.511 Aug 2026, 05:00 — 38 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:47 — 37 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 05:0011 Aug 2026, 10:47
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:4737-1
11 Aug 2026, 05:0038first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

284 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53843516657699721047225.4%
custom 51883650409688088954014.1%
custom 53077317083621277603913.7%
🍓3512.3%
🎉3311.6%
196.69%
custom 5195129648819752626186.34%
custom 547444440730437215982.82%
custom 528518258459727451562.11%
custom 542481343167911053162.11%
custom 527632686883905539131.06%
🕊20.704%
😢20.704%
👀10.352%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 May 2026, 17:41 UTC302 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟Сапп: этого не может быть, просто не может быть⚡️ 🌟🌟 ❌🔤сли честно, Стив иначе представлял себе утро с любимым человеком. В его голове постоянно крутилась фанатичная идеальная сцена: после подъема они еще чуточку нежатся в кровати, с трудом встают, готовят завтрак, а затем вместе его едят, ведя какую-нибудь увлекательную беседу или дурачатся. И в этих фантазиях явно не было места грозному взгляду Шерифа Джима Хоппера

🍓53🎉3🕊2👀1

27 Feb 2026, 17:53 UTC163 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @HawkinsHigh_netPhoto

🤩🤩истинная любовь 🤩🤩🤩заключается не в том, 🤩🤩🤩чтобы быть с кем-то, а в 🤩том, чтобы быть рядом с ним, даже если это невозможно. Джонатан Байерс и Стив Харрингтон становятся парой, олицетворяя крепкий союз, полный стабильности и уверенности друг в друге. Поздравляем! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

custom 53843516657699721044🍓2custom 518836504096880889521🎉1custom 51951296488197526261custom 52851825845972745151custom 53077317083621277601

25 Feb 2026, 15:04 UTC182 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌Сапп: решил вспомнить, что я великий несравненный эван- нн художник по стонатан со стажем больше двух лет. Лмао

🍓5custom 53077317083621277603custom 53843516657699721043custom 51883650409688088952custom 51951296488197526261

25 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC175 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😎🥹❌🌟😎💤🎼❌🪽🪽🤩 ❌❌❌🌟🤩🤩🤩❗ ❌🔠есмотря на тихую просьбу притормозить, Джонатан словно не слышал- или не хотел слышать. Он то и дело тянулся за новыми поцелуями, и Стив, вопреки собственным попыткам сохранить остатки самообладания, не жаловался. Напротив, он наслаждался каждой секундой этой внезапной близости, прижимая шатена к себе так крепко, как только мог. Его пальцы путались в растрепанных волосах Байерса, а лицо находил

custom 53843516657699721048custom 51951296488197526266custom 51883650409688088955🍓3custom 53077317083621277603🎉1custom 52851825845972745151

20 Feb 2026, 09:48 UTC139 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

😎🎧🎧💤❌❌🪦❌💤🪦🎧🎧 💤🎧🎼😎😎😞👍🥹🎼😎❌💤❌🔠юди никогда не волнуются о том, что им безразлично. Переживания будто всегда идут в комплекте с тем, что по настоящему дорого. Но как провести черту между приятным предвкушением и тем самым липким чувством тревоги, которое сковывает грудь, сжимает в тиски сердце, поэтому ты не можешь сделать один несчастный вздох? Не смотря на всю "популярность" Харрингтона среди девушек и частые отношения,

🎉5custom 53077317083621277604custom 538435166576997210441🍓1custom 51951296488197526261

7 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTC187 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😎⭐️📝ебятки, просвещаю вас в ❌свой план по захвату ❌❌Джонатана Байерса🪽 ❤️❤️🤩🤩💤💤🤩🤩💄💄💄 ❤️❤️ Так как он мне не отвечает, даже трубку не берет, а номера его мамочки у меня нет(в телефонную книжку мне лень ❌лезть), я планирую как мачо мэн приехать к нему домой, ночью, пролезть через окно в ❌❌комнату, сказать что «аххх, Джонатан, ты лучшее что со мной случалось за все мои 23 ❌года», подарить букет ландышей с гипсофилами, и

custom 51883650409688088957custom 53843516657699721046custom 53077317083621277603🍓2🎉2

5 Feb 2026, 11:17 UTC173 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⚫🗞😻Попытайтесь найти Робин. Я даю вам 3 попытки, ни за что не догадаетесь где она🙂 💤❌💤💤❌❌❌💤💤💤🌟

custom 53843516657699721046🎉5custom 53077317083621277605🍓4custom 51883650409688088952

4 Feb 2026, 13:49 UTC147 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌🌟💤Радует только одно- Робин еще у меня дома. А то по ощущениям я скоро сойду с ума.🤯

custom 52851825845972745154custom 53843516657699721044🎉3🍓2custom 53077317083621277602

4 Feb 2026, 13:43 UTC146 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪽❌🤣натоки, вопрос:❌⚫🤍 Рассчитайте скорость вскрытия вен Джонатана, учитывая тот факт, 🤩что он угрожал мне этим. Типо, if you leave me, I’ll kms. 🤩Ладно, сейчас не об этом. 🦷❌🤩🤩🤩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩 ❌❌🤩🤩🤩Все мои 💤💤🤩🤩🤩 гениальные мысли состоят из того, что нужно звать Робин, когда происходит полный 🤩пиздец, скажем так. После разговора с ней и обсуждения всей этой 🤩нервотрепки с Джонатаном, у меня будто гора с плеч упала. Мы вдвоем п

🍓7custom 53077317083621277605custom 51883650409688088954custom 53843516657699721043🎉2

2 Feb 2026, 15:30 UTC103 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026

😎❌📝ороче, встреча с Джонатаном прошла хорошо, как минимум-я жив. Вы рады этому? 🎀👻Думаю, да🖤 🎼🎼🌫️🌫️🩶🩶🙏🤩🤩🤩 ❌🌫️🌫️🌫️😻Сейчас я подобрал самую лучшую девушку на этой планете, а именно Робин. Мы едем ко мне, чтобы жарить картошку, ну, а 👻так же она мне поможет чутка с кое с кем, а то я в тупике вообще не знаю что да как… Я обещал рассказать Бакли о всей ситуации с ❌Байерсом, поэтому сегодня она пробует моим советчиком. ❌❌

5custom 51883650409688088955custom 53843516657699721045🍓2custom 53077317083621277602custom 52763268688390553911

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @the_SHarrington. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 435,370 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Steve‘s routine” (@the_SHarrington), 37 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_SHarrington.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.