Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ذكرى

Channel

ذكرى

@the24th_medical_batch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

455subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002482972863
TypeChannel
Username@the24th_medical_batch
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/the24th_medical_batch

Growth

455472463.524 August 2026 — 472 subscribers25 August 2026 — 472 subscribers31 August 2026 — 468 subscribers9 September 2026 — 463 subscribers18 September 2026 — 455 subscribers24 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 26 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 452–475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:15455-8
9 Sept 2026, 19:41463-5
31 Aug 2026, 17:43468-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:28472no change
24 Aug 2026, 01:15472first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.58%
avg views ÷ 455 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.3
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 August 202623 August 2026)
Views total179
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 09s
Average length
10m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC13 viewsread 24 August 2026

📖 قال الشيخ مقبل الوادعي رحمه الله: السلفية ليست جُبَّة! يلبسها من أراد، وإذا أراد خَلْعها خَلَعها، بل هي التزام بكتاب الله وسنة رسول الله ﷺ، علىٰ فهم السلف الصالح [ تحفة المجيب : (171)]

23 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC13 viewsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @MiraathalanbeyaaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

23 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC13 viewsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @MiraathalanbeyaaFile

File, posted without a caption

23 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC10 viewsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @MiraathalanbeyaaPhoto

#بطاقات_ميراث_الأنبياء ◻️ سلسلة: بدعة الإحتفال بالمولد النبوي 🔹 (12) بطاقة

23 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC17 viewsread 24 August 2026

هل سألت نفسك يومًا: لماذا قالت طائفة من اليهود: ﴿عُزَيْرٌ ابْنُ اللَّهِ﴾؟ ومن عُزير أصلًا؟ أكان رجلًا صالحًا من بني إسرائيل، أم كان له من الخصائص ما ليس لغيره؟ في زمنٍ من أزمنة ضعف بني إسرائيل، غزاهم بختنصر، ملك بابل، فقتل منهم خلقًا كثيرًا، وشرّد آخرين، وأسر من بقي، وقيل إنه أحرق التوراة وخرّب بيت المقدس، فحلّ ببني إسرائيل من البلاء والخراب ما الله به عليم. وكان عُزير من بني إسرائيل، وقد ذكر أهل العلم أنه كان رجلًا

23 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC14 viewsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hber_ph

موقف فاصل ونباغة عالم استمع يا من تقرّ بالمولد استماع المنصف فهذا نقاش علمي بحت بين طالب وعالم.

22 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC24 viewsread 24 August 2026

🔴«حيلة المفلس».. عندما يُشاغَبُ على الدليل بأفعال العصاة! من أقدم حيل أصحاب الأهواء والمعاصي عند محاصرتهم بالدليل الشرعي، اللجوءُ إلى مغالطة منطقية مكشوفة يُسميها العلماء «الشَّغَب بالمنكر على المنكر»؛ فتجد أحدهم إذا أُنعِمَ عليه بالتذكير وأُنكِرَ عليه منكرٌ أو عبثٌ بالدين، قفز قائلًا: "غارقون في الربا وجايين يتكلمون على العصيدة!" وهذه السلسلة الدائرية الخبيثة لا تنتهي؛ فإن خطب الخطيبُ عن الربا قال مروج المخدرات: "لم

22 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC20 viewsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @dr_elbukharyPhoto

‏[قولٌ في المولد] -للعلّامة الشّوكانيّ بحثٌ حول حكم المولد، وممّا قاله فيه: "لم أجد إلى الآن دليلاً يدلّ على ثبوته من كتابٍ ولا سنّةٍ ولا إجماع ولا قياسٍ ولا استدلالٍ؛ بل أجمع المسلمون أنّه لم يُوجد في عصر خير القرون، ولا الّذين يلونهم، ولا الّذين يلونهم" (الفتح الربانيّ)(٢/ ١٠٨٧) • 🔘https://t.me/dr_elbukhary • 🔄

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @the24th_medical_batch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ذكرى” (@the24th_medical_batch), 455 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the24th_medical_batch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.