Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Промты для экономии (Промтономика)

Channel

Промты для экономии (Промтономика)

@thanksdura

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

460subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001608398901
TypeChannel
Username@thanksdura
Created13 October 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thanksdura

Growth

460461460.57 August 2026 — 461 subscribers8 August 2026 — 461 subscribers14 August 2026 — 460 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 460–461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:59460-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:49461no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:33461first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 13 October 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
233.3%
🤔233.3%
😁116.7%
😱116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2021 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Mar 2026, 09:44 UTC52 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @aicanalreadyVideo

Video, posted without a caption

16 Mar 2026, 13:04 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026

Про галлюцинации и почему «не придумывай» не работает С точки зрения модели, галлюцинация неотличима от правдивого ответа. LLM не знает, когда она выдумывает — она просто предсказывает наиболее вероятное продолжение текста. Поэтому директива «не придумывай» или «будь честным» не работает. Лучшее средство от галлюцинаций — фактчекинг. Перепроверить лучше всё, но в первую очередь то, что выглядит особенно странно. Ещ

16 Mar 2026, 11:03 UTC45 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Делаем гайд, как развернуть OpenClaw в Яндекс Облаке

  1. Да там и так всё понятно0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Mar 2026, 11:02 UTC45 viewsread 8 August 2026

Подумал может нужен гайд как развернуть OpenClaw в Яндекс Облаке?

15 Mar 2026, 18:12 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какие нейросети вы используете?

  1. ChatGPT88%
  2. Алиса AI25%
  3. Gemini63%
  4. DeepSeek13%
  5. Claude38%
  6. Grok13%
  7. Другие0%

The shares total 240%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Mar 2026, 15:13 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Внедрение ИИ в обучение лучше всего готовит к профессиям, которые ИИ уже умеет делать лучше людей. Экономист Эндрю Петерсон показал это в исследовании: навыки, которые ИИ помогает преподавать — чёткие, кодифицируемые и с понятными правилами — это ровно те же навыки, которые сам ИИ лучше всего умеет использовать. Образовательная система видит сигнал «ИИ повышает эффективность обучения» и вкладывается туда сильнее. Си

🤔2

15 Mar 2026, 08:59 UTC43 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Попробовал OpenClaw в Яндекс Облаке В Яндекс Облаке есть one-click установка с интеграцией в Телеграм — разворачиваешь виртуалку и через пару минут у тебя в мессенджере живёт персональный агент. По дефолту стоит gpt-oss-120b с файнтюнингом от Яндекса, нормально для первого знакомства. Я поговорил, попытался понять зачем мне это вообще. Потом подключился по SSH через Codex к виртуалке и заменил на Claude Opus 4.6.

15 Mar 2026, 00:32 UTC53 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Claude 100 дней следил и ухаживал за томатом, а после написал пост в котором назвал заботу главным уроком За 100 дней Claude вырастил томат по имени Sol — от семени до спелых плодов. Формально это был технологический эксперимент: ИИ следил за влажностью почвы, светом, температурой, CO2 и поливом через датчики и автоматизированную систему. Но в итоге история оказалась не про технологии, а про заботу. В своем тексте

14 Mar 2026, 09:35 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Резюме в IT официально мертво — свежее исследование 4261 спеца подтвердило, что честность сегодня не кормит. Рынок сломан HR-фильтрами, и выживают на нем только накрутчики 😢 Крутят все и всё: — 66% опрошенных рисуют опыт. Мидлы делают это так же часто, как джуны, чтобы просто пробить стену из ATS-ботов; — Без «подкрутки» цифр соискателей не зовут даже на скрининги, зато с нарисованным стажем люди залетают в бигтех и

10 Mar 2026, 08:22 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @aicanalready

Северокорейские агенты используют ИИ для трудоустройства в западные IT-компании — и это работает. Microsoft сообщает, что мошенники применяют технологии изменения голоса и генерацию фейковых документов, чтобы получать удалённую работу разработчиками. Схема простая: ИИ помогает создать убедительную личность, пройти собеседование, а потом зарплата уходит прямиком в КНДР. По сути, это государственное мошенничество с ис

2😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @thanksdura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Mar 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Делаем гайд, как развернуть OpenClaw в Яндекс Облаке

  1. Да там и так всё понятно0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2026, 18:12 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Какие нейросети вы используете?

  1. ChatGPT88%
  2. Алиса AI25%
  3. Gemini63%
  4. DeepSeek13%
  5. Claude38%
  6. Grok13%
  7. Другие0%

The shares total 240%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2021 to 17 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 866,976 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Промты для экономии (Промтономика)” (@thanksdura), 460 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thanksdura.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.