Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘧. .

@th3bestfanof

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

242subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066294839
TypeChannel
Username@th3bestfanof
Created9 May 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/th3bestfanof

Growth

2427 Aug 2026, 20:01 — 242 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:47 — 242 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:018 Aug 2026, 09:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241–243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:47242no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:01242first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
639
Videos
1
Links
632

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53100480014047075718740.7%
custom 54653056317265099903918.2%
custom 52039137760630619313817.8%
custom 51973362569875535283014.0%
custom 5888771991019721366115.14%
custom 538652440382565708152.34%
custom 501949917184183609441.87%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 23 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2024, 19:39 UTC≈2,920 views145 reactionsread 8 August 2026

channel закрывается

custom 531004800140470757178custom 546530563172650999028custom 519733625698755352821custom 520391377606306193118

Signed ︎︎︎

23 Jul 2024, 18:45 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 8 August 2026

реквесты 🌞 пишем ✍️

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 13:10 UTC≈2,710 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

. .ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В ПРОКОМ КОНФЕШЕН. . 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Хотите поделиться своими любимыми пейрингами? А может просто не нравятся антисы? Тогда вам сюда! 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Бот для тейков Пост для вп Эмодзи-комбо Тв/кв пост Список администрации

custom 54653056317265099901

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 13:05 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrostikPhoto

ִ۫ 𝅄ׄ 𞥊꒰ ꯭ׄ✏️✏️✏️✏️ ✏️✏️✏️ channel . . . . . . здесь вы можете стать главным фанатом любого персонажа / пейринга ! ➿૮Ꮚ . hashtags :: ❤️ #NewCharacter ❤️#NewPairing ⁺ ⸝⸝ ⭐ ᯏ . ➿ ꒰ ➿➿ ᨦ . 𓆩 ⭐️ 𓆪 . ᨩ ➿ ➿ ꒱ 🧛‍♀️ (!) 🤍 Zzz ﹏ пост для вп :: ꒱১ 🧛‍♀️🧛‍♀️ пост для реквестов ୨୧ ꩜ . правила ★ ⊹ ➿ ꕀ · 💤 . ➿ ꕀ ⊹ . . навигация

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 12:00 UTC≈1,460 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Фу Сюань 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: Honkai: Star Rail 🍬best fan of. .

custom 52039137760630619312custom 53865244038256570812custom 51973362569875535281

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 11:31 UTC≈1,000 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Дотторе/Лиза 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: Genshin impact 🍬best fan of. .

custom 52039137760630619315

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 11:04 UTC860 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Терикула 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: Honkai impact 3rd 🍬best fan of. .

custom 51973362569875535282custom 53100480014047075711custom 58887719910197213661

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 10:33 UTC894 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Рокстар Фредди 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: FNAF 🍬best fan of. .

custom 58887719910197213666custom 51973362569875535281

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 10:04 UTC819 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Гонта 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: Danganronpa v3: killing harmony 🍬best fan of. .

custom 50194991718418360942custom 51973362569875535281

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 09:33 UTC767 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Скейтборд/Слингшот 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: PHIGHTING! 🍬best fan of. .

custom 53865244038256570811

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 08:32 UTC650 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Диса 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: Twitch 🍬best fan of. .

custom 53100480014047075713custom 58887719910197213663custom 51973362569875535282

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

23 Jul 2024, 06:30 UTC688 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 давайте узнаем кто лучший фанат Карин Зауэр 𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: Fear and Hunger 2: Termina 🍬best fan of. .

custom 52039137760630619314custom 50194991718418360942custom 51973362569875535281

Signed еùgen löwenzahn

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @th3bestfanof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,037,140 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘧. .” (@th3bestfanof), 242 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/th3bestfanof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.