Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔞Токсичный маркетинг 😂

Channel

🔞Токсичный маркетинг 😂

@tgsmm_marketing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653948271
TypeChannel
Username@tgsmm_marketing
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tgsmm_marketing

Growth

116119117.57 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers16 August 2026 — 119 subscribers24 August 2026 — 118 subscribers31 August 2026 — 117 subscribers19 September 2026 — 116 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:40116-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:35117-1
24 Aug 2026, 06:24118-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:25119+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:48118no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:08118first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1221.1%
🤣1017.5%
👍915.8%
🔥712.3%
610.5%
🤡610.5%
👀11.75%
👎11.75%
💊11.75%
💯11.75%
🖕11.75%
🗿11.75%
🥰11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC149 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Именно из за таких гайдов у админов не берут рекламу

1🤡1

11 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC161 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пишут что телегу могут разблокировать легко и просто, но Паша нихера делать не будет , отсюда и

💯1

9 Jun 2026, 20:27 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Макс: ну какое плохое зло я вам сделяль

😁3

9 Jun 2026, 20:26 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Макс: максимум удалений 😁

🤣2🔥1

24 May 2026, 14:15 UTC163 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Почему таргет лучше закупки ? Потому что таргет ведет конкретную целевую аудиторию, а не всех подряд кто забайтился на пост. Админам что барыжат цифрами таргет не нужен потому что они не наберут критическую массу целевой аудитории А бизнесу нужна именно целевая , поэтому большая часть внешки уходит в таргет. 1 - проще 2 - дешевле 3 - меньше возьми с документацией Поэтому и

🤣3👎1🔥1

23 May 2026, 19:36 UTC121 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Рынок очень сильно изменился в последнее время. Реклама больше не работает как раньше, так как принцип воронки на юзеров перестал восприниматься адекватно. Многих просто обьебывает переходит из одного места в другое. Сейчас выживаемость бренда зависит от массовости, бренд должен быть везде, постоянно попадаться человеку на глаза, плавно его программируя, что бы в случае запроса он точно знал куда ему идти. В слож

👍31🔥1

14 May 2026, 09:10 UTC128 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Рекламная сеть Яндекса запустила рекламную монетизацию для авторов каналов в мессенджере МАКС. Механика та же, что и в Telegram: вы задаёте настройки и минимальную цену за 1 000 просмотров (CPM), а РСЯ берёт на себя всё остальное — подбор рекламодателей, маркировку и публикацию постов, сбор статистики. Теперь у авторов больше возможностей для стабильного дохода, независимо от изменений на других площадках. Как работ

1😁1

11 May 2026, 20:08 UTC106 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShapsensesVideo

Above all, clothe yourselves with love, which is the sum of perfection. Col.3,14 Link - https://music.yandex.ru/artist/25913921?utm_medium=copy_link&ref_id=b8036b64-f5b3-499b-aa5e-302ffa65d1ed

🤡41👀1💊1🔥1🖕1🗿1🥰1

4 May 2026, 14:02 UTC133 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pervmarketingPhoto

П — победа: акции ВК обновили исторический минимум, несмотря на блокировки конкурентов

1👍1

29 Apr 2026, 09:56 UTC162 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Внутренний рынок это долговая пирамида, а внешке вот что рекомендуют 👇 РАЭК оценила рынок социальной коммерции в России и представила три сценария его развития. В оптимистичном варианте сегмент short-video commerce вырастет до 1,4-1,5 трлн рублей к 2027 году (10-12% e-commerce). В базовом – 380-400 млрд рублей, в консервативном – 140-160 млрд. Ключевые драйверы – снижение ставки, восстановление спроса и переход би

👍31🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tgsmm_marketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔞Токсичный маркетинг 😂” (@tgsmm_marketing), 116 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgsmm_marketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.