Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Воронов

Channel

Воронов

@tgcontest2007

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

616subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002132064250
TypeChannel
Username@tgcontest2007
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tgcontest2007

Growth

616619617.57 August 2026 — 618 subscribers8 August 2026 — 619 subscribers8 August 2026 — 619 subscribers14 August 2026 — 616 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 616–619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:13616-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:02619no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:30619+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:51618first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 11 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10951.9%
👍4019.0%
157.14%
👏62.86%
🤮62.86%
🥴62.86%
😐52.38%
🥱52.38%
😍41.90%
👎20.952%
💩20.952%
😱20.952%
🤔20.952%
❤‍🔥10.476%
🍌10.476%
😁10.476%
😡10.476%
🤝10.476%
🤣10.476%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 13 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tgcontest2007. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2025 to 18 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 18:02 UTC535 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍14🤔2😐2

18 May 2026, 18:02 UTC533 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍18😐3👎2

12 May 2026, 11:51 UTC695 views15 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спустя пол года, результаты по design и ios контестам. design был крайне душным - по тз, нет свободы идеи, как раньше - в этот раз нужно было сделать и android и ios макеты темная / светлая тема - макеты всех экранов + видео (в победителях только 2 и 3 места - первых мест нет) ios веселый, необычная интересная задача - сделать Liquid Glass для старых ios

🔥15

8 Mar 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,380 views19 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Такой только у меня и у вилсакома

🔥10😍4👏2😱2😁1

28 Dec 2025, 16:27 UTC≈2,130 views28 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥15🤮6👍2💩21❤‍🔥1😡1

26 Dec 2025, 17:48 UTC≈1,960 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥22🥴6👏4🤣1

23 Dec 2025, 16:37 UTC≈2,020 views31 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Готовлю работу для конкурса разработчиков. Осталось самое сложное - анимации таб бара/слайдеров и тогглов. На видео iOS 18

🔥19👍6🥱5🍌1

13 Dec 2025, 16:02 UTC≈2,480 views32 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Некоторые материалы по новому конкурсу. В этот раз задание очень объёмное и менее креативное, это немного печалит. Не знаю, правильно ли я понял задание, но я решил сделать что-то типа воркспейсов, куда можно добавлять существующие чаты и каналы или создавать новые внутри. Возможно, требовалось расширить группы с темами и добавить туда аудиочаты, как в Discord, это было бы логично. Но в задании ничего не сказано про

🔥284

30 Sept 2025, 10:43 UTC≈2,830 viewsread 8 August 2026

Сделал страничку на Product Hunt: https://www.producthunt.com/products/pricesbycountry-com Посмотрим, поможет ли это Гуглу активнее индексировать сайт

5 Sept 2025, 21:07 UTC≈2,810 views9 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему такого еще никто не сделал? - Так подумал я, когда искал, где можно посмотреть цены на Youtube Premium по странам. В итоге сделал сам: https://pricesbycountry.com Хочу попробовать раскачать SEO и получить органический трафик. Пока гугл не особо индексирует, посмотрим что будет дальше...

8🤝1

10 Jul 2025, 20:07 UTC≈2,860 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. 🇷🇺 Ага, интересно!66%
  2. 🇬🇧 Yeah, let's go34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tgcontest2007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jul 2025, 20:07 UTCAnonymous Poll238 voters

?

  1. 🇷🇺 Ага, интересно!66%
  2. 🇬🇧 Yeah, let's go34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 18 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 24,342 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Воронов” (@tgcontest2007), 616 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgcontest2007.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.