Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бажин | таргет в Telegram

Channel

Бажин | таргет в Telegram

@tg_bazhin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002491414317
TypeChannel
Username@tg_bazhin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tg_bazhin

Growth

100103101.57 August 2026 — 103 subscribers9 August 2026 — 103 subscribers15 August 2026 — 102 subscribers23 August 2026 — 101 subscribers30 August 2026 — 100 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 11:11100-1
23 Aug 2026, 11:45101-1
15 Aug 2026, 01:25102-1
9 Aug 2026, 09:32103no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:34103first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (22 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total27
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2837.8%
👍1824.3%
🔥1317.6%
🤣79.46%
👏34.05%
😁22.70%
🏆11.35%
👌11.35%
💯11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,794
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 17 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
933
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tg_bazhin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC27 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Готов взять в работу 1-2 новых проекта по TG Ads либо Авито Ads. Рассмотрю разные проекты, самый большой опыт у меня в продвижении: • E-Commerce, товарка и одежда • ВПНы • Боты. Нейросети, языки и тд. Актуальные кейсы есть в открытой таблице: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kEbKXvPnBF2nd8ZCBogvRZKnX16DvYTOHBf37dYvQjA/edit?usp=sharing Так же за рекомендацию меня, как таргетолога - плачу 10 000р

19 Jun 2026, 11:55 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🕵️‍♂️ ИИ - Аватары для вашего бизнеса. Недавно работал с интересным проектом, который занимается ИИ-Аватарами. Рекламу запускали в Авито.Реклама - теперь там тоже работаем) Кратко о результате: — рекламный бюджет: 45 000р. — 34 заявки с сайта — средняя цена подписчика: 1086 ₽ — продаж: 3 — выручка: 160 000р. Ребята делают вашу полную копию, либо просто генерируют персонажа и от его лица создают 20-30-40 роликов в

1

19 Jun 2026, 11:29 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Обновлял свою таблицу кейсов и приятно удивился, что еще несколько проектов перешагнули порог реализованного бюджета в 1 миллион рублей. К сожалению немного проектов, которые сейчас могут такие деньги вкладывать в рекламу, какие временна как говорится, такие и проекты 😃

3

30 Apr 2026, 08:33 UTC98 views3 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот это у меня эмоциональные качели с утра...) В одной нише видимо ушел крупный рекламодатель, и за вчера резко выросли охваты) Но Слава Богу! вчера это сопровождалось и низкой ценой CPA. Так что можно сказать повезло) Вот такое бывает с авто-правилами на пополнение бюджета🤣 В такие моменты чувствую себя каким-то трейдером 😁

3

25 Mar 2026, 08:17 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⚡️Для рекламы в Telegram и YouTube нужен переходный период до конца 2026 года, в это время ответственность применяться не будет, сообщает ФАС. Пока работаем друзья, а там посмотрим 💪

😁2

16 Mar 2026, 15:02 UTC140 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎉Можете поздравить, запустил первый проект на авито рекламе 😃 Пока клик в 12 раз дешевле, чем был, успех это или нет? Думаю рано делать выводы) Только тест, запустили много всего, так что дальше буду отделять овец от козлов так сказать 😅 Одно могу сказать - в ТГ конверсия из клика в подписку у нас была 42%, а тут пока 3% 🤪 Но опять же, цифры грязные еще очень) Делитесь как у вас, кого и там и там запускали, в ит

5

6 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC155 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😱Реклама в Телеграм не запрещена! Это Фейк. Вчера вечером в ТГ по каналам СМИ пробежала новость, о том, что якобы ФАС запретила рекламу в телеграм и завела уголовное дело. Началось это с информации одного лица о том, что якобы на него завели дело #08/05/5-37/2026 от 28.02 Я проверил в официальной Базе правовых решений в ФАС - дело с данным номером - отсутствует. Проверил специально и по дате дела - отсутствует. Е

👍1

2 Mar 2026, 14:37 UTC131 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🫣 Если телеграмм заблокируют. Провел опрос в двух своих каналах, с абсолютно разной аудиторией. Спросил продолжили люди сидеть в инсте и ютубе после блокировки, или нет. Поучаствовало в опросе 185 человек. Из 185 человек продолжают использовать заблокированные сервисы 122 человека - это 66%. В целом я сам предполагал примерно половину, оказалось даже больше. Что это значит для нас? Аудитория, которую вы собирае

2👏1💯1

25 Feb 2026, 13:42 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Как часто заходишь в ютуб?

  1. Каждый день56%
  2. Пару раз в неделю26%
  3. Не захожу19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

25 Feb 2026, 13:42 UTC144 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Как часто ты заходишь в инсту?

  1. Каждый день54%
  2. Пару раз в неделю25%
  3. Не захожу21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2026, 13:41 UTC133 viewsread 9 August 2026

Друзья, сейчас выложу 2 опроса, проголосуйте пожалуйста 😇

17 Feb 2026, 08:44 UTC163 views5 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

💰💰💰💰💰 Уменьшение минимального CPM Я думаю многие видели новость, об уменьшении начального CPM - почему таргетологи ликуют? CPM - это стоимость 1000 показов рекламного объявления, которую ты как на аукционе предлагаешь Telegram. 🧡 причина радости: Снижение стоимости подписки в действующих объявлениях. Если в твоей нише дешевый аукцион, и ты получаешь достаточно показов, то прямо сейчас снижай CPM и ты получишь боле

3🏆1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tg_bazhin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Feb 2026, 13:42 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Как часто заходишь в ютуб?

  1. Каждый день56%
  2. Пару раз в неделю26%
  3. Не захожу19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2026, 13:42 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Как часто ты заходишь в инсту?

  1. Каждый день54%
  2. Пару раз в неделю25%
  3. Не захожу21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 785,814 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бажин | таргет в Telegram” (@tg_bazhin), 100 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg_bazhin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.