4 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 325–328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 07:17
325
-2
22 Aug 2026, 17:02
327
-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:18
328
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:42
328
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5188481279963715781
7
31.8%
custom 5300935755839854273
5
22.7%
custom 5386745190914482793
4
18.2%
🐳
4
18.2%
custom 5192733456500542029
2
9.09%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2025 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tg5avenue. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2025 to 14 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👀 Дроп на $1500?
👨💻 Забираємо 5000 токенів SATU від Quantum Wallet!
Зараз можна отримати 5000 SATU , які оцінюються у $1500 .
Вкладень ніяких не потребує.
🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄🔄
🤔 Що робимо?
🟢 Завантажуємо Quantum Wallet (Android / iOS)
🟢 Створюємо гаманець (не імпортуємо, записуємо сид-фразу)
🟢 Заходимо в «Мій профіль» далі → Invite (поділитись з друзями), вводимо код Szq9T6.
Без нього токени не нараховують
🟢 Запрошує…
📱 Нове IDO у Binance Web3 Wallet
Беремо участь у новому IDO BubbleMaps (BMT) у Binance Web3 Wallet . Не скіпаємо!
Формат - перепідписка, минуле насипало 150$+ з акаунта
Що робимо?
✅ Поповнюємо Web3-гаманець Binance до 3 BNB (близько $1700).
✅ Переходимо на сторінку IDO BMT через головний екран гаманця або посилання.
✅ Чекаємо завершення сейла о 10:59 UTC. Повертають наші бнб, і зверху сиплять бмт.
✅ Продавати ток…
🔴
🟢 Домінація: 59,28%
🟢 Індекс жадібності: 20 (крайній страх)
За останні 24 години було ліквідовано 199372 трейдерів, загальна сума ліквідацій склала $523.73 🤔
Longs- $437.53M
Shorts - $86.21M.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Банківські обмеження 🛫 Курс фінансова грамотність ⌨️ Купити зірки stars ⭐ 5 Avenue | Фінанси 💎
☕️ Добрий суботній
🟢 Домінація: 59,19%
🟢 Індекс жадібності: 28 (страх)
За останні 24 години було ліквідовано 98144 трейдерів, загальна сума ліквідацій склала $401.76M
Longs- $299.37M
Shorts - $102.39M
До речі вчора на крипто-саміті запропонували створити FIFA coin, оцінивши індустрію в $175 млрд, і близько $5 млрд уболівальників.
Мене як фаната, ця ініціатива дуже гріє ✌️
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Банківські обмеження 🛫…
🙁 Ринок, після підписання угоди
🟢 Домінація: 59,22%
🟢 Індекс жадібності: 34 (страх)
За останні 24 години було ліквідовано 130187 трейдерів, загальна сума ліквідацій склала $467.56M 🤔
Longs- $360.10M
Shorts - $107.47M
Трамп вночі підписав все ж таки указ про створення стратегічного резерву 💰
Але в нього увійдуть лише конфісковані раніше криптоактиви. Откупи поки не плануються.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Банківські обмеженн…
👁 Безпека в криптовалюті
Зразу поясню без зайвих ілюзій: захистити себе на 100% від зламу неможливо. Якщо на вас цілеспрямовано працюватиме група професійних хакерів, вам pizда 💁♂️
Ваша мета - не зробити свій гаманець незламним, а зробити його настільки складним, дорогим і заплутаним для злому, що зловмисники просто підуть шукати легшу жертву.
🤫 Як хакери ламають криптогаманці? Інформація, яку ви не знайдете ж ві…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tg5avenue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5 Avenue | Фінанси” (@tg5avenue), 325 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg5avenue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.