Channel
@testu_slivu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
786subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001563411037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @testu_slivu |
| Description | Новинний сайт Його Величності Бога-Імператора @lit_short_bot - Зворотній зв'язок |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/testu_slivu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 786 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 786 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
852 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 266 | 31.2% | |
| 😢 | 236 | 27.7% | |
| 🔥 | 123 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 115 | 13.5% | |
| 🤬 | 31 | 3.64% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 3.64% | |
| 👎 | 28 | 3.29% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.822% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.704% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.587% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.235% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.235% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 852reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2024 to 20 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Навсяк попереджу, що я нічого не перевіряв на працездатність та безпечність, користуйтеся усім цим з обережністю і тд і тп. Хоча ми вже і не займаємося тестами, це не означає, що в нас зникло бажання зробити життя студента хочаб трошки легше.
👍19❤4🥰3
І ще одна ініціатива: Доброї ночі, хочу розказати і про свою альтернативу покійному Answers. https://ans.linerds.us/ "А нашо ще один сайт?" Відмовостійкість. Щоб не втрачати настільки цінний ресурс тимчасово або назавжди, головним пріоритетом рішення є зберегти інформацію у відкритому доступі та забезпечити простоту використання для інших, навіть якщо оригінальні автори будуть давно забуті. Рішення працює на баз…
👎20🔥8🤔2👍1
Вітаю, громадяни Імперіуму, на зв'язку Лорд-Інквізитор. Багато пройшло часу з тих пір, як варп-шторми розірвали простір, а зв'язок між Святою Террою та її підданими був втрачений... І ні, це не камбек) Минулого разу, перед тим як сказати усім "остаточне прощавай", ми порекомендували вам сервіс Mindenit, і якось так вийшло шо вийшло шопапала хтозна-що. Отже, до чого це я все. Мені написав єретик і самозванець Імперато…
🔥37❤4
Привіт всім. Це Mindenit. Великий Бог Імператор дозволив нам нагадати вам, що тепер відповіді на тести можна знайти на answers.mindenit.org. А ще ви можете зайти в наш ТГ канал та Діскорд-сервер, і фактично напряму впливати на розвиток сайту (а в ДС ви ще й з розробниками поспілкуєтеся) Чекаємо вас! Слава Імператору!
👍5👏5👎2🤬2😁2❤1🥰1😢1
Ітак, всім доброго дня, говорить труп на троні. Останнім часом так склалось, що в мене фактично дві роботи та магістратура. Можу сказати, що це були цікаві 5 років (хоча й бере сайт початок ще зі школи). Зараз Імператору треба йти займатись іншими достатньо важливими речами, тож, нажаль, вимушений вас покинути. Всім дуже вдячний за підтримку, посильну допомогу та теплі слова за всі ці роки, але маю йти далі... 5-го г…
😢172❤12👍1😱1
Тест 7-8 вже на сайті
🔥26❤3👍3😁3
Як обіцяв публічно у коментарях, якщо хтось випустить додаток для браузера для проходження текстів - розповім про нього. Ось команда мінденіт зробила такі застосунки: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/mindenit-answers/koifgahcdnbhoeabkoihigijapfnaapi?authuser=0&hl=uk&pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/uk/firefox/addon/mindenit-answers/
👍21👎6❤1🤬1
Сьогодні Імператор рано прокинувся, у лісі щось подохло та тому тест вже вийшов)
🥰27❤4👍1👏1
І ще новий (старий вже) тест 5
❤20👍2
І новий тест (якому вже тиждень) вже на сайті тест 2
❤28🔥6
Наразі, будьте уважні, там одне питання не підібрав адекватної відповіді, тож якщо знайдете, пишіть)
❤29
Доброго вам здоров'я. Бачу я трішки деякі у єресь скатились, мол помер Імператор! Немає його більше і покинув на призволяще! А він працює, працює поки злі язики його хоронять. Ось тест 1 А загалом, планував вдень вже опублікувати, та хостинг провайдер вирішив за несплату влітку видалити сайт, тож було через тикання їх з бекапу підіймати, тож пів дня тільки підіймали сам сайт Всім гарного вечора та не розпускайте чуто…
❤58
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @testu_slivu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 292,684 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Імперіум| ТЕСТИ та НОВИНИ” (@testu_slivu), 786 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/testu_slivu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.