Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @ruonhaan vouch’s ♥

Channel

@ruonhaan vouch’s ♥

@testhikuc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002751552558
TypeChannel
Username@testhikuc
Created11 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/testhikuc

Growth

64686616 August 2026 — 64 subscribers17 August 2026 — 66 subscribers25 August 2026 — 68 subscribers16 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 04:0768+2
17 Aug 2026, 11:4866+2
16 Aug 2026, 19:3164first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 11 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

308 reactions across 3 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52086982966163642527424.0%
custom 52898123402990160394915.9%
custom 60711849042578034903611.7%
custom 5397977990682403634299.42%
custom 5222407729145987946278.77%
custom 5467541853693824758278.77%
custom 5303354690010887032237.47%
custom 5222381757478750189216.82%
custom 5411261822017751665134.22%
92.92%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 11 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2025, 11:26 UTC≈4,480 views67 reactionsread 16 August 2026

only http://t.me/ruonhaan

custom 607118490425780349018custom 522238175747875018912custom 52086982966163642528custom 53979779906824036348custom 52898123402990160396custom 52224077291459879465custom 53033546900108870325custom 54675418536938247585

11 Aug 2025, 10:56 UTC≈4,790 views97 reactionsread 16 August 2026

bukti login aplikasi premium 😻🫰 • nama aplikasi : • tipe & durasi : • dev & lokasi : catatan kecil : no proff login dalam waktu 12 jam : nogar & tidak ada toleransi terimakasih 🙏

custom 528981234029901603931custom 5397977990682403634129custom 52223817574787501899custom 52086982966163642528custom 52224077291459879467custom 53033546900108870327custom 54675418536938247587

11 Aug 2025, 10:56 UTC≈4,960 views144 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

bagaimana pelayanan mu ? 🙏 seribu / sepuluh untuk ress ini karna se wahh ituu cuyy suka bngt sama harga yang murcee tapi kualitas ++++ jarang banget nemu yang kaya gini ⭐️⭐️⭐️ i'll give 1OOOO of 1O adminnya bener' fast respon pengerjaan nya pun sat set, pastinya trusted & amanah dapat bintang 5 😩🤍

custom 520869829661636425258custom 522240772914598794615custom 546754185369382475815custom 541126182201775166513custom 528981234029901603912custom 530335469001088703211custom 607118490425780349011custom 53979779906824036349

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @testhikuc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@ruonhaan vouch’s ♥” (@testhikuc), 68 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/testhikuc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.